PJC Journal – Original » 2009

Jan

31

Key to a police state, loyal to the Party not the state

IanPJ Main Page 3 comments

The Government announced during the past week the following piece of disturbing news. As press releases go, few would spot the sinister nature of yet another government IT programme, but read carefully, because it begs more questions, many more questions than a simple press release should.

A contract for the Serious Organised
Crime Agency has nearly doubled in potential value, due to its
extension to other policing bodies

Soca had expected to spend between £300m
and £500m on its integrated information management and communications
infrastructure, known as the 2010 Programme, according to a pre-tender
notice it published in the Official Journal of the European Union in December.

But if the deal is extended it could be worth up to £800m, according to a tender notice published on 28 January 2009.

The other organisations which may use the
infrastructure are the Home Office, the UK Border Agency, the Identity
and Passport Service, the Criminal Records Bureau, the National Police
Improvement Agency, UK police authorities and their “statutory
successors and organisations”.

Soca intends to award the contract next year and to complete the development of its new service 12 months later.

The first question is: Why is Soca taking the lead in the 2010 programme?

We have written before about Soca, (The Serious Organised Crime Agency (SOCA) is an Executive
Non-Departmental Public Body sponsored by, but operationally
independent from, the Home Office), which unlike the police do not have a Royal Charter, a virtually private police force set up by the Home Office that reports directly to the minister, not the state. Political Police.
Note: Serving Police Officers that wish to join Soca have to resign and rescind their oath to the Queen before joining.

The Chair of SOCA, is appointed by the Home Secretary, is responsible for SOCA’s overall approach and for its relationship with Ministers. One of the approaches of this 'Law Enforcement' agency is political suppression, as outlined in the Serious and Organised Crime Act, and is responsible for suppressing our right to protest in any areas arbitarily designated by the Home Secretary.

An organisation, headed by politically motivated and aligned personnel
that can be used outside of the Judicial system (as described by Lord Justice Sedley) at both a national and
local level, essential and historically proven in all dictatorial
regimes. The parallels in the setting up of this agency with dictatorial enforcement organisations such as the Stazi and the Gestapo can be viewed here. (Other articles on SOCA can be found on this site, use the search facility on the right toolbar).

With that political and suppressive role in mind, I would remind you again of the 2010 programme overall, and its threat to free and individual life in the UK. Something that I wrote about here in Sept 07.

Now moving back up to the Press release.
Look at the other organisations that will be linking to this new 'Network' being built by Soca.

1. The Home Office.

2. The UK Border Agency (a Shadow Agency the Home Office??. The UK Border Agency is responsible for securing the United Kingdom borders and controlling migration (That means In and Out, Immigration is an add on)).

The Agency brings together the work previously carried out by the
Border and Immigration Agency, Customs detection work at the border
from Her Majesty's Revenue and Customs (HMRC) and UK Visa Services from
the Foreign and Commonwealth Office (FCO). (have these departments been reduced by the same numbers?)

They are a
global organisation with 25,000 staff, including more than 9,000
warranted officers, operating in local communities, at our borders and
across 135 countries worldwide. (surely our borders stop at…erm, our borders).

3. The Identity and Passport Service (Executive Agency sponsored by, but operationally
independent from, the Home Office. ID Cards have been described by the minister responsible as Internal Passports).

4. Criminal Records Bureau. (The Criminal Records Bureau (CRB) is run as an Executive Agency of the Home Office by Civil Servants, and delivers the service through a number of strategic partnerships with Capita. Very similar in nature to the CRO (Criminal Records Office) now owned and operated by the ACPO, private Ltd company).

5. National Police Improvement Agency. (The NPIA is a policing organisation acting as a central resource to the police service, working for ACPO (Association of Chief Police Officers), APA (Association of Police Authorities, another Ltd company) and the Home Office, headed by an ex Reuters journalist, which operates many of the databases, some of which still have no legal basis, NDNAD, National Fingerprint, Sex offenders, ANPR, PNC, Interpol link, e-Borders to name but a few). The NPIA does not operate as an independent body.

6. UK Police Authorities. The really worrying wording here is and their “statutory successors and organisations”. At what point are the Government to abolish sworn police officers and replace them with Non-Departmental bodies, such as PCSO's and the like already under the control of the privately owned and politically motivated ACPO.

If anyone is still in any doubt of the creation of a police state, loyal to the Party which has bought and paid for that loyalty, perhaps the press release above will change your mind.

They are preparing us to being pushed, filed, stamped, indexed, briefed, debriefed and numbered, the linking of these organisations should indicate to all that they are preparing not to keep people out, but to keep us in (again, something that all dictatorial regimes tend to do, how long before this power is extended to other defaults), and in a very controlled state.

'Population de la France, Bravo!'

IanPJ Main Page Add you comment

Yes,
the French go on strike at the drop of a hat. Whether I agree with them
or not is irrelevant, bloody hell do I respect the French for getting
up off their arses and pointing out that they are pissed off, and will
not put up with it.

And they've kicked off in Paris tonight.

Meanwhile the Lyonnais mourn the loss of civil liberties.

How
long until we see scenes like this on the streets of the UK, could
anyone care less, or are we all too concerned about the recent spat
between two plastic titted, bottle orange 'celebrities'?

H/T Snowolf

Strikes in the North of England & Scotland
Thirty years on from the Winter of discontent that brought Labour down, social unrest about threats to jobs starts in the UK

The Supreme Leader has been caught out in yet another massive fib.

As
has Phil Useless Woolas with his points system to ensure that
only skilled workers who are desperately needed to fill jobs for which
no qualified British Workers are available are allowed into the country.

People are beginning to get more than a bit tetchy.

and on the same day, The Chinese Premier admits in Davos that his country is facing major
challenges and social unrest, the French are having an organised day of
action against the State, albeit motivated by the State loving Left,
the French Security services have proudly told the world's press that
they are keeping surveillance on Left wing and anarchist groups,
arresting people without evidence.

The people in Iceland have thrown
out their PM and Government and there are violent riots across Europe.

What
is happening in the UK is far more worrying. We have a Prime Minister
who can no longer bear to be told the truth, cannot even admit to
himself how bad things are, and refuses to acknowledge the findings of
respected International Organisations.

On top of that we have a
compliant BBC still pretending it is impartial, refusing to acknowledge
that this recession is causing a seismic change in how we run our
affairs, it is business as usual, no reports of real substance, just
some irritating spokesperson that feels it necessary to lecture
parents about the dangers of children drinking at our expense. (perhaps all those French rioters are mentally disturbed having been raised on a glass of wine a day from the age of 2).

The BBC was defeated by Alistair Campbell and Blair, and cowed into submission ever since.

Our unelected leader has clearly lost the plot and we cannot afford another eighteen months of this.

Radical action needs taking, before Gordon Brown and his acolytes take us down.

1.
Not one further penny into the Banks by the Taxpayer. Those that are
insolvent now will continue to be insolvent. RBS has no idea what its
liabilities are, and should be broken up. Regional Banks set up with
fresh capital and horror of horrors a guarantee given to these new
institutions for five years.

2. These Regional Banks should
employ Bankers who understand the role and function of Banking in
society not chancers who have run supermarkets. Send them to Beirut for
training if neccessary.

3. Whitehall be broken up, all powers
apart from Defence and Foreign affairs returned to the Counties, my
preference is for Lander style Government.Abolish all Quangos and Fake
charities sponging off the state and Taxpayer.

4. A
Convention called by all Political Parties on a written Constitution
that protects our Liberties as individuals, and proscribes some of the
actions of the previous two administrations as unconstitutional.

5. A Constitutional Court to deal with politicians and Peers who have decided that lying and graft is a way of life.

6. A single transferable vote system to ensure no further minority Governments with 'landslide' victories.

7.
End all Planning Acts that artificially restrict building land and
force up housing cost, thus reducing 80% of the population to mortgage
slaves, depriving the young of their own homes.

8. End the War in Afghanistan immediately. Restructured Army, that is well paid and equipped, and is there purely for Defence.

9. The UK to be a Federation of England, Scotland, Wales and Cornwall with Independent Parliaments.

10. Withdraw from the EU.

China
is an amalgam of ethnic peoples, as is Russia, as is Europe and India,
we have seen the Rise of the Nation States in the last three hundred
years, I believe we are seeing the slow death of the Nation State.
Kurdistan is a de facto independent State from Iraq, it is well run,
peaceful and economically stable. In whose interest is it to force it
back into Iraq, do we seriously expect all of the countries of the
former Yugoslavia to be forced back into one Nation. No we do not.

The UK should not be forced into a European state.

England
was always a small , successful and stable State, the only people who
ever benefit from large States are those who make a living from the
State.

Their time is coming to an end.

H/T (with small mods) Old Holborn

'Population de la France, Bravo!'