FRANCE played an active role in the 1994
Rwanda genocide, a report unveiled today by the Rwandan government
said, naming French political and military officials it says should be
prosecuted.

“French forces directly assassinated Tutsis and Hutus accused of
hiding Tutsis… French forces committed several rapes on Tutsi
survivors,” said a justice ministry statement released after the report
was presented in Kigali.

The
500-page report alleged that France was aware of preparations for the
genocide, contributed to planning the massacres and actively took part
in the killing.

It named former French prime minister Edouard
Balladur, former foreign minister Alain Juppe and then-president
Francois Mitterrand, who died in 1996, among 13 French politicians
accused of playing a role in the massacres.

The report also names 20 military officials as being responsible.

“Considering
the seriousness of the alleged crimes, the Rwandan government has urged
the relevant authorities to bring the accused French politicians and
military officials to justice,” the statement said.

The 1994
genocide in the central African nation left around 800,000 people -
mainly minority Tutsis and moderate Hutus – dead, according to the
United Nations.

Justice Minister Tharcisse Karugarama
presented the report to the press in Kigali, more than two years after
a special commission tasked with probing France's role in the genocide
began its work.

The statement said the military and
humanitarian Operation Turquoise carried out by the French in Rwanda
between June and August 1994 abetted the killings perpetrated by the
extremist Interahamwe Hutu militia.

The French military “did not challenge the infrastructure of genocide, notably the checkpoints manned by the Interahamwes.”

“They
clearly requested that the Interahamwes contine to man those
checkpoints and kill Tutsis attempting to flee,” the statement said.

The release of the report comes against a backdrop of tense relations between France and Rwanda.

In
November 2006, Kigali severed diplomatic ties with France after French
investigating magistrate Jean-Louis Bruguiere accused Kagame of
involvement in the death of the then president, Juvenal Habyarimana, a
Hutu.

Habyarimana's plane was shot down above Kigali airport on April 6, 1994, sparking the genocide.

Hattip News.com.au

I am truly fed up of
these convenient mistakes the State keeps making in regards to
so-called terrorist attacks. Anyone would think they were doing it on
purpose to create a dialectic in which the State can implement
totalitarianism. Our government is infested with communists after all.

Source: Daily Mail

A chance to stop the 7/7 bombers may have been missed when a secret services fax to police went missing.

A damning report is expected to reveal that the MI5 document, sent
to West Yorkshire police, raised suspicions about ringleader Mohammed
Sidique Khan and accomplice Shehzad Tanweer.

But the information was either lost or not followed up and the opportunity to monitor the men was missed.

Well what was it? Did
the fax arrive at the police?  Faxes leave a digital trail should it
shouldn’t be hard to find out (unless of course finding out what
happened was never the true goal). If it did arrive then it must have
been picked up by someone.

Survivors of the attacks have been told the findings of the
Intelligence and Security Committee are ‘devastating’ and suggest the
men could have been stopped long before their bombs tore through three
Tube trains and a bus.

News of the report, which has already been sent to Gordon Brown,
emerged as the three-month trial of the only three people charged in
connection with the 2005 attacks ended dramatically at Kingston Crown
Court yesterday.

After 15 days of deliberation the jury of eight women and four men
were unable to agree a verdict on a charge of conspiracy to cause an
explosion. More than three years on from the atrocity, which left 52
dead and hundreds injured, and after a painstaking police investigation
which has cost almost £100million, the victims are no closer to justice.

July 7 survivor Rachel North said last night: ‘A fax was sent from
the security services to West Yorkshire police flagging up the bombers.
They are at fault because they didn’t phone and follow the fax up, but
West Yorkshire police are also at fault because what happened to that
fax? Did it just fall on the floor or something?

Yeah right. How often does that happen when a Secret Services Fax arrives? £100 million investigation? And they didn’t arrest this man
and ask him a few questions? This company was running terror drills on
the same day that just so happened to mirror what actually happened. By
the way, the probability of that being an innocent coincidence is
practically zero.

He mentions that his
scenarios where decided with help from his clients. Who where his
clients then? Why was this ignored by the so-called investigation?

In order to address this, we have one simple demand, that the government RELEASE THE EVIDENCE which conclusively proves, beyond reasonable doubt, the official Home Office narrative.

For more information regarding the lies and myths about July 7th, visit www.julyseventh.co.uk/

Hattip Free Britain

I am truly fed up of
these convenient mistakes the State keeps making in regards to
so-called terrorist attacks. Anyone would think they were doing it on
purpose to create a dialectic in which the State can implement
totalitarianism. Our government is infested with communists after all.

Source: Daily Mail

A chance to stop the 7/7 bombers may have been missed when a secret services fax to police went missing.

A damning report is expected to reveal that the MI5 document, sent
to West Yorkshire police, raised suspicions about ringleader Mohammed
Sidique Khan and accomplice Shehzad Tanweer.

But the information was either lost or not followed up and the opportunity to monitor the men was missed.

Well what was it? Did
the fax arrive at the police?  Faxes leave a digital trail should it
shouldn’t be hard to find out (unless of course finding out what
happened was never the true goal). If it did arrive then it must have
been picked up by someone.

Survivors of the attacks have been told the findings of the
Intelligence and Security Committee are ‘devastating’ and suggest the
men could have been stopped long before their bombs tore through three
Tube trains and a bus.

News of the report, which has already been sent to Gordon Brown,
emerged as the three-month trial of the only three people charged in
connection with the 2005 attacks ended dramatically at Kingston Crown
Court yesterday.

After 15 days of deliberation the jury of eight women and four men
were unable to agree a verdict on a charge of conspiracy to cause an
explosion. More than three years on from the atrocity, which left 52
dead and hundreds injured, and after a painstaking police investigation
which has cost almost £100million, the victims are no closer to justice.

July 7 survivor Rachel North said last night: ‘A fax was sent from
the security services to West Yorkshire police flagging up the bombers.
They are at fault because they didn’t phone and follow the fax up, but
West Yorkshire police are also at fault because what happened to that
fax? Did it just fall on the floor or something?

Yeah right. How often does that happen when a Secret Services Fax arrives? £100 million investigation? And they didn’t arrest this man
and ask him a few questions? This company was running terror drills on
the same day that just so happened to mirror what actually happened. By
the way, the probability of that being an innocent coincidence is
practically zero.

He mentions that his
scenarios where decided with help from his clients. Who where his
clients then? Why was this ignored by the so-called investigation?

In order to address this, we have one simple demand, that the government RELEASE THE EVIDENCE which conclusively proves, beyond reasonable doubt, the official Home Office narrative.

For more information regarding the lies and myths about July 7th, visit www.julyseventh.co.uk/

Hattip Free Britain

I am truly fed up of
these convenient mistakes the State keeps making in regards to
so-called terrorist attacks. Anyone would think they were doing it on
purpose to create a dialectic in which the State can implement
totalitarianism. Our government is infested with communists after all.

Source: Daily Mail

A chance to stop the 7/7 bombers may have been missed when a secret services fax to police went missing.

A damning report is expected to reveal that the MI5 document, sent
to West Yorkshire police, raised suspicions about ringleader Mohammed
Sidique Khan and accomplice Shehzad Tanweer.

But the information was either lost or not followed up and the opportunity to monitor the men was missed.

Well what was it? Did
the fax arrive at the police?  Faxes leave a digital trail should it
shouldn’t be hard to find out (unless of course finding out what
happened was never the true goal). If it did arrive then it must have
been picked up by someone.

Survivors of the attacks have been told the findings of the
Intelligence and Security Committee are ‘devastating’ and suggest the
men could have been stopped long before their bombs tore through three
Tube trains and a bus.

News of the report, which has already been sent to Gordon Brown,
emerged as the three-month trial of the only three people charged in
connection with the 2005 attacks ended dramatically at Kingston Crown
Court yesterday.

After 15 days of deliberation the jury of eight women and four men
were unable to agree a verdict on a charge of conspiracy to cause an
explosion. More than three years on from the atrocity, which left 52
dead and hundreds injured, and after a painstaking police investigation
which has cost almost £100million, the victims are no closer to justice.

July 7 survivor Rachel North said last night: ‘A fax was sent from
the security services to West Yorkshire police flagging up the bombers.
They are at fault because they didn’t phone and follow the fax up, but
West Yorkshire police are also at fault because what happened to that
fax? Did it just fall on the floor or something?

Yeah right. How often does that happen when a Secret Services Fax arrives? £100 million investigation? And they didn’t arrest this man
and ask him a few questions? This company was running terror drills on
the same day that just so happened to mirror what actually happened. By
the way, the probability of that being an innocent coincidence is
practically zero.

He mentions that his
scenarios where decided with help from his clients. Who where his
clients then? Why was this ignored by the so-called investigation?

In order to address this, we have one simple demand, that the government RELEASE THE EVIDENCE which conclusively proves, beyond reasonable doubt, the official Home Office narrative.

For more information regarding the lies and myths about July 7th, visit www.julyseventh.co.uk/

Hattip Free Britain

By Obnoxio

Making a case for Libertarianism, Part 3

This is part of an ongoing series of posts outlining my understanding of Libertarianism and its benefits and consequences.

And
then there is the Tenth Commandment. 'Thou shalt not covet thy
neighbor's house, thou shalt not covet thy neighbor's wife, nor his
manservant, nor his maidservant, nor his ox, nor his ass, nor anything
that is thy neighbor's.' The Ten Commandments are God's basic rules
about how we should live — a brief list of sacred obligations and
solemn moral precepts.
The first nine Commandments concern
theological principles and social law. But then, right at the end, is
'Don't envy your buddy's cow.' How did that make the top ten? What's it
doing there? Why would God, with just ten things to tell Moses, choose
as one of those things jealousy about the starter mansion with
in-ground pool next door?
Yet think how important the Tenth
Commandment is to a community, to a nation, indeed to a presidential
election. If you want a mule, if you want a pot roast, if you want a
cleaning lady, don't be a jerk and whine about what the people across
the street have — go get your own.
The Tenth Commandment sends a
message to all the jerks who want redistribution of wealth, higher
taxes, more government programs, more government regulation, more
government, less free enterprise, and less freedom. And the message is
clear and concise: Go to hell.
– P.J. O'Rourke

Taxation

The
Libertarian Party of the UK has already promised to abolish income tax
completely. It can afford to do just by removing state funding from all
the unelected quangos in the UK. If these quangos are genuinely useful,
they will attract funding from local businesses and local individuals.
If they are not, they will wither and die, and a lot of interfering
busybodies will have to find something useful to do with their lives.

In
an ideal world, the state would not be needed and taxation would
consequently not exist. However, Libertarian taxes would generally be
consumption taxes, like a Sales Tax with rates aligned to the “social
costs” of the type of product being bought. What I would expect,
though, is a much simpler tax code and much less resistance to paying
it, because the outcomes of the money should be more obvious.

There would also be a lot less to spend it on. Anybody who reads Timmy
knows that government job-creation is actually a cost to society, not a
benefit. Government programs hoover up our taxes and spend them very
inefficiently on things that the government thinks is important. We may
not agree about their importance, but we have no control over it in the
current political climate. But even if we did agree that those things
were important, we could achieve them far more cost-effectively than
the government could.

And at the end of it all, those government
spending projects remove money from the economy that could be used by
us to do things that matter to us.

Europe

Because
Libertarians believe in determining their own future and because we
believe in not being subject to any laws but our nation's own, we would
withdraw from the EU. We would still happily trade with any nation that
wanted to trade with us including any nation within the EU, but we
would not be willing to subject to any externally sourced regulation.

The NHS

I'm
pretty sure that this will draw a lot of emotional response, but in a
truly Libertarian world, there is no place for state-controlled
provision of medical care. The NHS would be dismantled and individual
people would be able to interact with individual care providers and
move between them freely.

Since hospitals would no longer be
able to draw a business-saving government subsidy whether they killed
people indiscriminately with MRSA or not, I would expect a dramatic
improvement in cleanliness. Given that the government would also not be
micro-managing their every objective, I'd expect a massive refocusing
of resources away from management and back into primary care.

Oh,
and before anybody starts: the NHS is not free. It's funded by
taxpayers. I personally paid more into the NHS this month than a fully
self-funded medical insurance package would cost me. That's without the
queues; the rude, nosey receptionists; the appalling service and the
outrageous parking costs.

I, for one, will not miss it in the slightest.

Syndicated from Obnoxio the Clown and LPUK