Who is actually running Britain. Nominally it should be the Prime Minister Gordon Brown, but this lame duck traitor is not. He is only a front man, and a dire one at that.
Brown is no more in control of Britain than Robert Mugabe.
An as yet unnamed elite, lawless organisation is actually running the country by
stealth, in effect a silent insurrection from within. The control must be total,
absolute, and lead top-down from the centre. What and who cannot be controlled
must be destroyed by nulabor. An unelected cadre already runs the country,
bypassing Parliament, the Judiciary, and all the institutional safeguards that
were designed to ensure our freedoms.
Meanwhile, it is daily reported how
our leaders lie, cheat, steal, bully and abuse, yet there is a reticence – for
fear of retribution – to using the appropriate description – institutionalised
corruption – that has repeatedly, relentlessly, ruthlessly, systematically and
cynically destroyed the lives of anyone arbitrarily deemed to be a potential
threat.
It is an expensive business to run an insurrectionist alternative
power cult in parallel with what the ordinary decent citizen perceives as
democracy. However, any perception of local democracy, people empowerment, or
meaningful engagement in consultation to inform and contribute to the
decision-making processes is a carefully engineered illusion.
It is
necessary to create control structures, finance them, then train people to head
these on behalf of the nulabor cult, to pay for fixers, and to employ the miriad
of minions in the non-jobs. The money from this comes from both the current
central government, and from the billions of Eurofunds.
These created structures
are used to facilitate the falsification of evidence of prior consultation and
concensus needed for eligibility for the funds.
To staff these structures, and
to ensure placement of the chosen people in the right places, there needs to be
a nulabor centrally controlled leadership training establishment, working as a
charity. The truth is, the training establishment is not training leaders at
all, it is doing the opposite, training automatons to do the bidding of their
masters, regardless of morality, ethics or the law.
Why a charity?
Because charities do not attract the same level of cycnicism and scrutiny as
public authorities, they are not subject to freedom of information laws, they
are easy and naive prey for the nulabor elite, and charities are easy
organisations for strategic positioning to exert influence, interest and control
far beyond their legal remit.
In addition, where the chosen leaders are placed
in a charity positioned for strategic control, they form the perfect base for
money-laundering.
Where existing charities can't be taken over, they are
destroyed, and new charities created. Where charities prove themselves to be
providing a needed service, they are targeted for privatisation, and the
tax-liable jobs falsely claimed to be employment creation. There is no job
creation, just transfer.
The secretly chosen recipients of 'training' are
to be found in highly lucrative positions of many of the decision-making quangos
with financial controls. They also ensure that the nulabor social-re-engineering
projects are funded in preference to any other, whilst refusing any applications
not in keeping with the nulabor agenda.
Once the right steps are in
place, the nulabor project can continue unfettered, having control of people,
publicity, processes, and pecuniary pursuits. Threats are destroyed. All this
being done covertly, with the cadre elite of the cult even deciding who can have
what information.
This nulabor government is corrupt. The nulabor
corruption is absolute, led from the top down, imposed through all tiers of
social and government control, down to street level. Being rotten to the core
and from the core, everything it touches it taints. Having neither the ability
nor inclination to correct itself, outside intervention is
indicated.
This statement can be extended to democracy itself.
Perhaps it
is not only the government that must be replaced, but the style of government,
as the current flavour leaves such a bad taste. Our leading politicians, to whom
we are entitled to look for behavioural guidance, have failed to make the
distinction between what is legal and what it right.
Finding a loophole to do
something does not make what is wrong, right. The very act of looking for a
loophole is evidence of intent to act amorally. It is no use saying that no
rules have been broken, and therefore the behaviour is OK. Those not acting in
the spirit of the law, or not capable of making the distinction between right
and wrong, have no place in our society, and certainly not as our leaders or
representatives in any government.
In the UK, democracy is dead. Despite
the claims to devolve democracy, empower people, or derogate decision-making,
what we have seen is the creation and maintenance of an illusion of
consultation, followed by false claims of consensus. In truth, central control
is tightened, as so-called community leaders are politically placed and imposed,
and so on upwards through every control tier to nulabor HQ.
SO now we
have described what we have today, and how we arrived at this sorry
state.
The next question must be, WHY ? and Where is all this leading us?
There is no left or right in politics any more.
This battle is about one thing, Authority versus Liberty.
There IS another way!
Your Life, Your Country, Your Choice.
