An informative update on what is going on with the US — and wider — economy can be found by listening to this week's McAlvany Weekly Commentary.

Topics
covered in this half hour conversation range through the US housing
market, how the US looks to be going into an inflationary depression,
the fact that there is now $1.2 quadrillion tied up in derivatives (up
from $681 trillion at the start of the year), Goldman Sachs'
involvement with the US Treasury, National Australia Bank's recent
decision to write-down 90% of its holdings of US mortgage debt (an
admission that it AAA-rated securities were virtually worthless), the
fact that around $5 trillion of US mortgage debt is considered “risky”
and, last, but not least, that it is quite likely that US sovereign
debt will be downgraded — that is, even Treasury securities are no
longer a safe hold.

These waves are only just starting to lap our shores. Forewarned is forearmed.

From the LPUK blog.

Recourse is ours in any eventuality regarding the real truth with the simple understanding of the 1911 Parliament Act and the two crucial elements changed within this Act namely;

  1. The presumption that the royal assent would always be presumed to be
    automatic- no Sovereign would be allowed an opinion nor could they act
    as the Constitutional safe guard with this presumption.

  2. The removal of the Lords powers of Veto against all taxation bills
    with subsequent effect of the full destruction of the Lords powers.

You quite simply come to the understanding, without the need of men’s lies to the simple recognition of the truth, that is;

  1. Her majesty has never actually signed any Act or Treaty nor has any
    Sovereign from 1911 onwards, the last to sign being George V; The
    Parliament Act of 1911.

  2. That the power of the Lords to Veto any bill has been destroyed
    including the actually destruction of the true Lords being from
    hereditary peers to life peers.

  3. That the true power in this country resides with us the people, we
    have Sovereignty, and we only lend the power to be governed properly,
    so to destroy our Sovereignty, you first must destroy the very element
    we invested that power in.

  4. Parliament has claimed Sovereignty illegally after removing the
    elements that stood in its way, by way of the 1911 Act; the Lords and
    the Sovereign.

  5. To use the lies of men to destroy the need for our Sovereign by
    getting the people to believe in those lies so they do the job for
    them; exactly what our government have achieved by way of the internet
    and the main stream media and with a relentless series of gatekeepers
    to shroud the truth.

Her Majesty, I feel, is in Constitutional prison with two elements of fear being used against her; two elements are as thus;

  1. The fear of abolishment from a Sovereign Nation to a
    Republic which is educed by the governments control over the people and
    the relentless propaganda to force the peoples will into destroying
    their own Sovereignty, by simply removing the Constitutional safe
    guard; remember we have Sovereignty, even though people are deluded,
    they could do this, without even realizing what they are doing, with
    the pressure applied by the traitors.

  2. And that she now truly feels her people have deserted her.

Our Sovereign, true Law; no Sovereign, true Law cannot exist.

We need our Queen and our Queen needs us; for
without this, our Sovereignty, our Nation and our Law cannot survive,
for these are the most crucial elements needed to be in place, for our
Constitutional Law to work, for without this it cannot work, as is most
evident in any court of law, and subsequent legislation being imposed
on us as a people.

I know from that fateful time in 1911 that all
Sovereigns of this nation have not only believed they have lost the
ability to protect their people, they have lost the respect of the
people, not through their own doing, but through the lies of men and
the peoples inability to see through those lies for what they really
are. We have allowed ourselves to be so conditioned by these lies, that
we as a people are destroying the very element that can save us in a
stroke of a pen and have allowed for the destruction of two crucial
elements that would have protected us from the dictatorship that now
resides not only in the Commons of this country but also in the Lords.

The truth is we are to blame for the destruction of this country and all that is happening now and all that will happen. Why?…Because as a people we have failed ourselves and
allowed this to go on for so long and have allowed for two very crucial
elements of our Constitution to be destroyed. We have allowed ourselves
to be fooled by the lies of men and men's knowledge, portraying a
reality we all seemingly believe, based upon our own inability to see
the faults in ourselves and rather to continually see the faults in
others and then blame them faults in others for something that has only
resulted because our own failings.

In reality true law must have a attribute that is
based upon the only real true divine rule of law; no one, without any
exception is above the law. Law must be built upon morality, an
absolute, our Constitutional Law stands for that attribute, although
not worded, but in clear concise morality, when understanding the
Wisdom of those who penned it. Any law built upon the attributes of
control and fear lacks that one crucial attribute, which amounts to
only one understanding; it is not law at all, but just a system of
control in the guise of law.

Our Constitutional Law holds recourse for any
eventuality that will be forced upon us as a people . It allows for the
people to use their sovereignty to enter into Lawful Rebellion to
assist our Sovereign and help them use our strength as a people, to
bring about the change so few seek and so many are completely unaware
of, to return back to the true rule of law and a true governance based
upon our freedoms, or quite simply it allows for us to remove our
Sovereign, to be replaced by a new English Sovereign of the peoples
choosing, who will govern this country and the people of this country
based upon the morality of our true Constitutional law and the freedoms
asserted by our Law.

The 1911 Parliament Act was Parliaments first grasp
at true control of this country, the Sovereign and its people and it
will be their undoing, when the people quite simply understand what it
actually achieved for these traitors and successive traitors, and what
has resulted from the biggest , most blatant act of treason committed
against this country, its people and its Sovereign.

On a personal note (John Harris, Public Defender, founder of TPUC):

In sending my Affidavits to Her Majesty I used our
Constitutional Law and used Constitutional documents (Affidavits
invoking article 61 of Magna Carta 1215 the founding document of our
Constitution) to deliver a clear and concise message to my Sovereign
and to the traitors in Parliament. The message to my Sovereign; I am
here to help, the message to the traitors; the games up.

Her Majesty, the traitors in Parliament and myself
fully understand what recourse the people of this country have at their
disposal, through the use of Constitutional Law, in any occurring
eventuality regarding the truth that will be known. Simply this is what
the traitors fear, they fear you actually realizing the truth, that you
have true law at your disposal, as you are the ones who have
Sovereignty and once the British people realize that by using their own
Constitutional Law in their defence, they can rid themselves of
political diversion, subversion and suppression of the true law of this
land and those who have illegally and treacherously done this, along
with their legislation, rules and control, and actually stop their
obsessive desire to destroy this country.

To Read this article and much more about how our Sovereignty has been stolen visit the The Public Defender on TPUC.org

Under this nice feminine firstname, Edwige, lies a brutal and ugly political reality : a police database of a scope and nature unseen since Petain's regime.

Using
the drowsiness of summer, without any public debate nor legislative
discussion, the French government is adopting the use of a police
database aiming at a retrieving information on all kinds of activists
involved in politics, unions, NGOs, religious groups, … since the age
of 13 (!) and without any limitations in the range of information
collected, nor any time limit in keeping the datas. 

This
is what is happening next to the celebration of the French Revolution,
in Sarkozy's France. Even the infamous Patriot Act in the USA does not
go that far!

Behind the bling-bling
operations like the Union pour la Méditerranée, doomed to fail since
its inception because of its lack of consistency, and the outrageous
'défilé de dictateurs' for the 14
th of July on the
Champs Elysées, the European citizens must be aware that the current
chairman of the EU is a great son of Petain, rather than a heir of
General De Gaulle.

Submission to the
powerful, merciless for the weakest, fascination for money and pomp,
obsession for police control and summary justice,….  here are the key
features of the current president of the EU, Nicolas Sarkozy, as the
French painfully discovered in the last 14 months, explaining why no
more than 20% of them now find anything positive in his tenure of power.

With
Edwige, the French authorities go one step further down the road of a
Petain-style French state (‘l'Etat français’ as it was called by these arch-enemies of the Republic, of its laicity, of its pretention to tame
the powerful and give the voice to the people). With Edwige, French
police forces, which have not asked for such a tool, are pushed towards
becoming closer to the vile 'Milice' which was focused on arresting
freedom fighters rather than criminals.

Let’s
think one minute of what can be the use of collecting and keeping data
on citizens whose main characteristics is to be active in society,
within NGOs, unions, political parties, since the age of 13. Preventing
terrorist attacks? Preventing criminal acts? Very unlikely as anywhere
in the democratic world, citizens who are very active in their
communities tend to be the best defence for any antisocial behaviours.

So,
let's search in another direction, and the fact of starting the data
collection from 13 years old gives us a terrible clue: Sarkozy's
government wants to file all potential social and political activists
since their very first years. Not to protect them or to help them of
course. But to be able to influence them when possible, to press them
if needed and to threaten them when required.

No doubt that in the Place de la Condorde's tribune on the 14th
of July, Nicolas Sarkozy got some good advices on how to manage such a
database from his dictators friends. Assad, Mubarak or Ben Ali for
instance do know very well how to control activists, jail and torture
opponents.

If it was a shame for
France to get this bunch of dictators for the anniversary of the
Revolution, it is now undoubtedly a danger for the French people and
French democracy to have Edwige coming into force in coming weeks. And
it is a direct threat for all European citizens and democracy as a
whole in the EU to have a national politician with such projects at the
head of the EU.

On this continent,
democracy will only survive and prosper if we fight for it at the
European level, otherwise, our small national democracies, already
weakened by the EU increasing powers, will end up being infected one
after the other by the antidemocratic forces awakening in one or the
other country. 

Sarkozy is not alone. Have
a look at his friend Berlusconi
who now plans to collect data on all
Italian citizens … in order to avoid that doing so only for the Roms
will make it illegal in a European context. You get the process : use
the opportunity of some popular emotions, propose a freedom-killing
proposal, then extend it if any opposition surges and try to pass it
through the EU channels to make it a trans-European law (like the
recent 18 months detention for illegal immigrants).Then contamination
ensues throughout the EU.

We must stop
these trends with all our forces if we want to ensure that Europe and
Democracy will be compatible in the future. And a crucial method in
order to do so is to do it on the European level, preventing our
national leaders to concoct on a national level their antidemocratic
viruses before they inject them into the EU system. The most important
political playing field of the coming years is the European one. This
is where our democratic future will be shaped, for the best or for the
worst.

Regarding Edwige, a group of
French associations has recently launched a petition to oppose Edwige.
I just signed it as president of Newropeans, with the authorisation of
the Newropeans Board of Directors. 

And
with Newropeans we believe that citizens, associations, unions,
religious groups, and political parties from all over the European
Union should also sign this petition, in order to show that we all feel
like a 13 year-old potential social or political activist!

Don't
forget that this is about our children and their future ability to act
freely within tomorrow's Europe. Time to act is therefore now!
Let's sign the anti-Edwige petition from all over the EU!

Franck Biancheri
Président de Newropeans

Funny how all of these State rulers just happen to be
pushing for police states in their respective countries at the same
time… Under the control of the EU.

Hattip Newropeans Magazine

This interesting post from England Expects is worth reposting if only to highlight the bad science used by both the EU and our Government to introduce crap and repressive laws.

Well that must be the way to read the response from the Commission to a
question from Godfrey Bloom.(referring to the title of the post)
The question was based on a link to an article by Dave Hitt I found on the Joe Jackson website.

The question went something like this,

WRITTEN QUESTION E-3520/08
by Godfrey Bloom (IND/DEM)
to the Commission

Subject: Environmental tobacco smoke

According to the Commission Green Paper 'Towards a Europe free from tobacco smoke: policy options at EU level' (pdf) (COM(2007)0027), more than '79 000 adults' die in the EU per annum from the effects of environmental tobacco smoke (ETS).

This
claim is the driver behind the proposals by the Commission to bring in
a binding directive later this year to enforce smoking bans in
workplaces.

Given that the impact of such a directive will be considerable, both economically and
socially,
could the Commission please name three or four people who have died
from ETS within the European Union in the last two years?

Which is a bit cheeky but I think makes the point.

The answer finally arived on the Parliament's last working day before the summer recess,

E-3520/08EN
Answer given by Ms Vassiliou
on behalf of the Commission
(18.7.2008)

The
Green Paper 'Towards a Europe free from tobacco smoke: policy options
at EU level” , refers to the estimates of mortality attributable to
passive smoking in the EU reported by Smoke-free Partnership in Lifting
the Smoke-screen: 10 reasons for a smoke-free Europe . These estimates
are based on the international evidence on the level of risk posed by
exposure to environmental tobacco smoke (ETS) and the estimated
proportion of the population exposed rather than individual cases of
deaths due to passive smoking. The nature of the epidemiological
evidence on all risk factors, be they chemical or other, is such that
it does not allow to identify the victims at individual level but only
populations.

The Commission is now considering several possible
policy options including a possible proposal for a Council
recommendation as a follow-up of the Green Paper.

The Impact
Assessment currently being carried out will provide a basis for the
final policy choice. It will also provide further information on the
impact of exposure to ETS on health.

That appears to be a
No, I think, we cannot.

Everything is based on nmodels and estimates.
Not the real world. A pathetic answer that fails to deal with the fact
that thousands of people will be amde jobless and a way of life, that
is pub, bar and club culture will be destroyed. Why? Because they want
to, not because they have any scientific evidence.

However the
Commissioner's answer may in fact be something to do with a little
known case at the Civil Service Tribunal. This, the junior partner of
the European Court of Justice, gave a judgement on what is known as the
Labate case.

The
applicant, Mrs. Kay Labate, widow of former European Commission
official Mario Labate, on her own behalf and on behalf of her husband's
estate, contests the Commission's decisions refusing to recognise the
lung cancer of her husband as an occupational disease.

Mr Labate
was an official with the Commission for 29 years, during which time he
was exposed, according to the Applicant, to a large amount of
secondhand tobacco smoke. He was declared permanently invalid following
the discovery of the lung cancer which subsequently led to his death.
He submitted a request for recognition of the illness as an
occupational disease.

Ah so they wouldn't want to admit to
passive smoking being the cause of death or they would get by any
number of claims. That would affect the Commission's own bottom line as
the compensation paid could be punitive. Sure enough look at the
Commission arguement,

While acknowledging Mr
Labate's exposure to secondhand tobacco smoke and finding no other
cause for his lung cancer, the Medical Committee in its decision
nonetheless stated that it could not establish with certainty the
connection with his professional activities. The Commission accordingly
denied the request, following the finding by the Medical Committee that
the connection between the disease and Mr Labate's professional
activities was not sufficiently established.

The judgement states quite baldly

“The claims for compensation submitted in the letter of 25 October 2007 by Mrs Labate are dismissed as manifestly unfounded”

So
either we are all going to die of passive smoking (Ref. the upcoming
smoking at work directive) or we are not(see Labate judgement).

This seems to be a case of the Commission having its cake and eating it, or maybe filling its pipe and smoking it.

Which begs the question: Why are we putting up with shite like this?

When will the population of the UK realise that there are more of us than there are of them, and we can put a stop to this kind of crap.

Every day, we make
decisions on topics ranging from personal investments to schools for
our children to the meals we eat to the causes we champion.

Unfortunately, we often choose poorly.


Both the Conservative leader, David Cameron, and the US Democratic
presidential candidate, Barack Obama, have expressed interest in what
is being dubbed 'the new third way', or Communitarianism.

Recently popularised by Sunstein and Thaler's Nudge,
this political philosophy argues that totally free markets can lead to
disaster because human individuals are not actually very good
decision-makers, but also that rigidly controlled markets (with lots of
rules, regulations, and state intervention) are similarly not the most
effective. Their thesis is that a government should use its powers to
'nudge' people to make better decisions in their lives, without
explicitly forcing them to. How the government decides what those
'better decisions' might be, is another question altogether…

If you search the web,
you will find numerous articles about 'libertarian paternalism', most
of which are fairly complementary. However, a moment's pause for
thought should persuade you that the term is
actually a contradiction in terms, and, for libertarians everywhere, a
fresh threat to the true meaning of the word 'libertarian'.

You might also recall the phrase
being used by Julian Le Grand, the chairman of Health England, when he
proposed earlier this year that smokers should have to purchase a licence in order to be allowed to indulge their habit.

Hmmm, First they nudged the smokers…

A paper by Sunstein and Thaler titled Libertarian Paternalism Is Not An Oxymoron
fleshes out some of their thinking, and further background on their
thesis can be found by listening to these two interviews with Sunstein and Thaler.

Mises.org published a review of Nudge back in May, which deals with some of the issues raised in an eloquent manner, and I would urge you to read it, so that you might get a better feel for the onslaught against genuine libertarian values that is to come.

The publicity for this book tells us:

Thaler and Sunstein
invite us to enter an alternative world, one that takes our humanness
as a given. They show that by knowing how people think, we can design
choice environments that make it easier for people to choose what is
best for themselves, their families, and their society. ThalerSunstein demonstrate how thoughtful choice architecture can be established to nudge us in beneficial directions without restricting freedom of choice.

So, first the State assumes the role of mind reader and knows how we think, then they choose your lifestyle, knowing what is best for you, and all you have to do is passively pretend that you did by choosing the least worst option.

The same principle applies when you take your younger children to buy shoes. As their parents, you decide they can have this pair or that pair based upon cost or style, but let them make the final choice. The child then feels that they chose the shoes they are now wearing and is happy and you as their responsible parents know that they have got a pair of shoes that you approve of.

However, we are not children, but Nudge is advocating that we be treated as such 'because we make poor choices'., or 'vote the wrong way'.  And that, if you have not yet worked it out, is putting a candy coated
wrapping around the ultimate authoritarian Nanny State…Communitarianism, the new politics of the EU, so
eagerly being pursued by the Tory Party.

Dont be fooled by them, because THAT is the kind of Liberty that David Davis was promoting with his sham election in Haltemprice & Howden, and never forget why all those draconian laws are already in place.

Put simply, we will try to nudge you into the corral so you don't realise until its too late, but if you wont go quietly, then we have the cattle prods ready.

Shall we say this again one more time on this blog:

There is no left or right in politics any more.
This battle is about one thing, Authority versus Liberty.