From EU Referendum

Updating us on a story first run by the Yorkshire Post last September – of which The Daily Telegraph made a complete hash the following week, the Mail on Sunday
is telling us that Britons are to be asked to put a sticker proclaiming
the rights of European Union “nationals” on the back cover of their
passports.

From 1 July next year, all new passports issued in
the UK and other member countries will quote Article 20 of the EU's
founding treaty. But in the meantime, the paper says, the EU commission
has also told the British government to produce stickers quoting the
article and encourage as many people as possible to put them on their
passports.

This, of course, is a “tip of the iceberg” story arising from the publication last year of the commission's communication
on “Diplomatic and consular protection of Union citizens in third
countries.” That document sketches out plans gradually to replace
member state embassies and consular offices with joint EU offices (also
spotted by the YP), progressively taking over the functions of the member states, a process aided and abetted by member states which are already embarking on their own programmes of embassy closures.

This is all part of a long-term programme, given new impetus with the Hague Programme agreed by the European Council in December 2004. But, relying on powers acquired in the Maastricht Treaty, it had already been set in train in 1995 with a Council Decision “regarding protection for citizens of the European Union by diplomatic and consular representations”.

It
is typical of the media, therefore, to go for the fluff, the rather
trivial issue of a sticker in the passport – merely the outward
acknowledgement of the gradual encroachment of the EU into areas
formerly the exclusive preserve of member states.

But, if the
media can be forgiven for going for the easy hit – on the basis that
that is what the media does – not so our part-time shadow foreign
secretary, William Hague, who happens to share his name with the very
programme that is designed – amongst other things – to undermine our
whole system of overseas representation.

Obviously unaware of the bigger agenda, he is cited by the MoS,
declaring that Ministers should tell the EU to mind its own business.
“Once again the EU is desperate to muscle in on passports. Our
Government should remind them that British passports are still
primarily Britain's business,” he says.

The clue to the man's
ignorance comes in his next comment though, where he adds: “The danger
is that this is all part of a broader Brussels agenda to extend their
control over how people are looked after abroad. Now it's passports –
next it could be visas and embassies” (our emphasis).

If we were a swear blog, now would follow a long string of expletives. It is not a matter of could
The gradual takeover of embassies and consulates is already planned and
in progress, reported as recently a week ago (just over) by The Daily Telegraph, which just happens to quote a certain Mr William Hague.

If
Mr Hague really does not know what is going on, then one wonders
whether he should be spending more time with his books and commercial
interests, and even less time (like none) on his job as shadow foreign
secretary.

From EU Referendum

Updating us on a story first run by the Yorkshire Post last September – of which The Daily Telegraph made a complete hash the following week, the Mail on Sunday
is telling us that Britons are to be asked to put a sticker proclaiming
the rights of European Union “nationals” on the back cover of their
passports.

From 1 July next year, all new passports issued in
the UK and other member countries will quote Article 20 of the EU's
founding treaty. But in the meantime, the paper says, the EU commission
has also told the British government to produce stickers quoting the
article and encourage as many people as possible to put them on their
passports.

This, of course, is a “tip of the iceberg” story arising from the publication last year of the commission's communication
on “Diplomatic and consular protection of Union citizens in third
countries.” That document sketches out plans gradually to replace
member state embassies and consular offices with joint EU offices (also
spotted by the YP), progressively taking over the functions of the member states, a process aided and abetted by member states which are already embarking on their own programmes of embassy closures.

This is all part of a long-term programme, given new impetus with the Hague Programme agreed by the European Council in December 2004. But, relying on powers acquired in the Maastricht Treaty, it had already been set in train in 1995 with a Council Decision “regarding protection for citizens of the European Union by diplomatic and consular representations”.

It
is typical of the media, therefore, to go for the fluff, the rather
trivial issue of a sticker in the passport – merely the outward
acknowledgement of the gradual encroachment of the EU into areas
formerly the exclusive preserve of member states.

But, if the
media can be forgiven for going for the easy hit – on the basis that
that is what the media does – not so our part-time shadow foreign
secretary, William Hague, who happens to share his name with the very
programme that is designed – amongst other things – to undermine our
whole system of overseas representation.

Obviously unaware of the bigger agenda, he is cited by the MoS,
declaring that Ministers should tell the EU to mind its own business.
“Once again the EU is desperate to muscle in on passports. Our
Government should remind them that British passports are still
primarily Britain's business,” he says.

The clue to the man's
ignorance comes in his next comment though, where he adds: “The danger
is that this is all part of a broader Brussels agenda to extend their
control over how people are looked after abroad. Now it's passports –
next it could be visas and embassies” (our emphasis).

If we were a swear blog, now would follow a long string of expletives. It is not a matter of could
The gradual takeover of embassies and consulates is already planned and
in progress, reported as recently a week ago (just over) by The Daily Telegraph, which just happens to quote a certain Mr William Hague.

If
Mr Hague really does not know what is going on, then one wonders
whether he should be spending more time with his books and commercial
interests, and even less time (like none) on his job as shadow foreign
secretary.

Less than 2 weeks after loosing an unprecedented number of local councils, the Labour party who has promised to listen and learn still proves that its rejected ideology is more important than the voters or their wishes.

Five Labour councillors, including the former leader of Durham County Council, have been suspended from the party reports the BBC.

The five were suspended by the Labour's National Executive Committee (NEC) after it ordered that all areas should have a 50-50 split of male and female candidates for the local elections.

It later permitted the Easington party to field seven female candidates – four short of the original figure required, because the Easington party said not enough women had come forward.

Former miner Albert Nugent was one of those caught up in the dispute over failing to have enough women candidates. He was suspended on Friday and a new leader Simon Henig was voted in at a meeting at County Hall on Saturday.

Mr Nugent said: “I feel like I've been stitched up – why could they not have waited until Monday after the leadership vote?

“I've been debarred from representing those who elected me. We are supposed to be positively discriminating for women yet the powers that be have suspended two women. We should be trying to bring the party together but we are destroying it.”

Quite, but this is listening and learning Labour style. Voters don't matter to NuLab.

There IS another way!

Your Life, Your Country, Your Choice.

Less than 2 weeks after loosing an unprecedented number of local councils, the Labour party who has promised to listen and learn still proves that its rejected ideology is more important than the voters or their wishes.

Five Labour councillors, including the former leader of Durham County Council, have been suspended from the party reports the BBC.

The five were suspended by the Labour's National Executive Committee (NEC) after it ordered that all areas should have a 50-50 split of male and female candidates for the local elections.

It later permitted the Easington party to field seven female candidates – four short of the original figure required, because the Easington party said not enough women had come forward.

Former miner Albert Nugent was one of those caught up in the dispute over failing to have enough women candidates. He was suspended on Friday and a new leader Simon Henig was voted in at a meeting at County Hall on Saturday.

Mr Nugent said: “I feel like I've been stitched up – why could they not have waited until Monday after the leadership vote?

“I've been debarred from representing those who elected me. We are supposed to be positively discriminating for women yet the powers that be have suspended two women. We should be trying to bring the party together but we are destroying it.”

Quite, but this is listening and learning Labour style. Voters don't matter to NuLab.

There IS another way!

Your Life, Your Country, Your Choice.

Less than 2 weeks after loosing an unprecedented number of local councils, the Labour party who has promised to listen and learn still proves that its rejected ideology is more important than the voters or their wishes.

Five Labour councillors, including the former leader of Durham County Council, have been suspended from the party reports the BBC.

The five were suspended by the Labour's National Executive Committee (NEC) after it ordered that all areas should have a 50-50 split of male and female candidates for the local elections.

It later permitted the Easington party to field seven female candidates – four short of the original figure required, because the Easington party said not enough women had come forward.

Former miner Albert Nugent was one of those caught up in the dispute over failing to have enough women candidates. He was suspended on Friday and a new leader Simon Henig was voted in at a meeting at County Hall on Saturday.

Mr Nugent said: “I feel like I've been stitched up – why could they not have waited until Monday after the leadership vote?

“I've been debarred from representing those who elected me. We are supposed to be positively discriminating for women yet the powers that be have suspended two women. We should be trying to bring the party together but we are destroying it.”

Quite, but this is listening and learning Labour style. Voters don't matter to NuLab.

There IS another way!

Your Life, Your Country, Your Choice.