As Mr Eugenides has noted, the campaign to get Darling banned from the nation's pubs is gathering pace.

There is now a Facebook Group and, as Jim points out, a Tory MSP, Alex Johnstone, has even issued a press release.

Johnstone Urges Pub Ban For Darling

Following
an Edinburgh landlord's decision to ban the Chancellor of the Exchequer
from his premises after a budget that was punitive for drinkers, North
East Tory MSP Alex Johnstone is urging pubs across the North East to
follow suit and demonstrate their condemnation of the tax hikes on
alcohol.

Mr Johnstone said “The Chancellor has raised the duty
on alcohol under the pretext that it is in a bid to combat binge
drinking. But by even the simplest calculations, his tax hike will do
nothing more than raise money for the treasury. For example, if an
individual went out and drank ten pints of cider in an evening, then Mr
Darling's efforts in beating the booze culture will in fact have cost
the drinker just thirty pence more. That’s hardly going to make someone
think twice is it?”

“As for the extra fifty nine pence that was
slapped on a bottle of whisky, it has since been revealed that this
might not even raise any extra cash at all. I'm sure this will give
cold comfort to the many people employed in the whisky industry,
especially across the North East, whose jobs were put at risk by this
extra duty.”

“No-one underestimates the need for action in
tackling Scotland's booze culture, it is something that needs urgent
attention and a holistic attitute. This budget does nothing to address
this and I'm not alone in being disappointed that the government has
come up with such a simplistic response.”

Mr Johnstone concluded
“Barring Mr Darling from licensed premises will send a clear message,
that ordinary, responsible drinkers should not be seen as a soft touch
for raising money to pay for previous fiscal incompetence.”

Not only would it send a clear message, but it would also be absolutely hilarious.

One
wonders, of course, whether Darling would lower himself to going into a
pub—after all, it might be full of horrible members of the disgusting
electorate, and that would never do—but wouldn't you love to be a fly
on the wall as Darling walks into a bar, with a group of his
hangers-on, and is promptly turned away by the manager?

So go on, convince your local landlord or landlady to Ban Alistair Darling. Put the blame for the price hikes in beer prices where it belongs, with the Government, and tell them they are not welcome.
If, of course, you happen to be a publican, feel free to use the
image above, compliments of the Devil. Simply click on it and you will get a
full A4 size poster for you to print off and stick in your window…

as Mr E says,

As someone once said in almost the exact opposite context: let's do some good…

HatTip Devils Kitchen

As Mr Eugenides has noted, the campaign to get Darling banned from the nation's pubs is gathering pace.

There is now a Facebook Group and, as Jim points out, a Tory MSP, Alex Johnstone, has even issued a press release.

Johnstone Urges Pub Ban For Darling

Following
an Edinburgh landlord's decision to ban the Chancellor of the Exchequer
from his premises after a budget that was punitive for drinkers, North
East Tory MSP Alex Johnstone is urging pubs across the North East to
follow suit and demonstrate their condemnation of the tax hikes on
alcohol.

Mr Johnstone said “The Chancellor has raised the duty
on alcohol under the pretext that it is in a bid to combat binge
drinking. But by even the simplest calculations, his tax hike will do
nothing more than raise money for the treasury. For example, if an
individual went out and drank ten pints of cider in an evening, then Mr
Darling's efforts in beating the booze culture will in fact have cost
the drinker just thirty pence more. That’s hardly going to make someone
think twice is it?”

“As for the extra fifty nine pence that was
slapped on a bottle of whisky, it has since been revealed that this
might not even raise any extra cash at all. I'm sure this will give
cold comfort to the many people employed in the whisky industry,
especially across the North East, whose jobs were put at risk by this
extra duty.”

“No-one underestimates the need for action in
tackling Scotland's booze culture, it is something that needs urgent
attention and a holistic attitute. This budget does nothing to address
this and I'm not alone in being disappointed that the government has
come up with such a simplistic response.”

Mr Johnstone concluded
“Barring Mr Darling from licensed premises will send a clear message,
that ordinary, responsible drinkers should not be seen as a soft touch
for raising money to pay for previous fiscal incompetence.”

Not only would it send a clear message, but it would also be absolutely hilarious.

One
wonders, of course, whether Darling would lower himself to going into a
pub—after all, it might be full of horrible members of the disgusting
electorate, and that would never do—but wouldn't you love to be a fly
on the wall as Darling walks into a bar, with a group of his
hangers-on, and is promptly turned away by the manager?

So go on, convince your local landlord or landlady to Ban Alistair Darling. Put the blame for the price hikes in beer prices where it belongs, with the Government, and tell them they are not welcome.
If, of course, you happen to be a publican, feel free to use the
image above, compliments of the Devil. Simply click on it and you will get a
full A4 size poster for you to print off and stick in your window…

as Mr E says,

As someone once said in almost the exact opposite context: let's do some good…

HatTip Devils Kitchen

UPDATE: 27/3/08: The Bill to repeal s132-s138 has now been published.

The
Observer has a short piece of media spin, ahead of what they claim will
be a Government pronouncement, supposedly later this week.

Ban on protests at Parliament to be lifted

Gaby Hinsliff
The Observer,
Sunday March 23 2008

A controversial ban on protests outside the Houses of Parliament will
be scrapped by Home Secretary Jacqui Smith this week in a symbolic
victory for freedom of speech campaigners.

[...]

Gaby Hinsliff is the Political Editor of The Observer, and so has presumably been briefed by a suitably well placed spin doctor.

Assuming that this anonymously briefed story is true, the Home
Secretary does have the power to rescind or to amend the Statutory
Instrument Order which sets out the extent of the Designated Area
around Parliament Square.
under sections 132 to 138 of the Serious Organised Crime and Police Act 2005.

Given how untrustworthy the current Government is, we will wait to see exactly what the Home Secretary Jacqui Smith really announces in detail, before celebrating any return to the status quo ante.

In
theory, this poorly defined Designated Area could extend as far as “1
kilometre in a straight line from the nearest point in Parliament
Square”, but the current extent of this is not as great an area as
that, but it is still far too large for the stated purpose of
preventing disruption to Parliament e.g. it extends to cover the London
Eye ferris wheel on the other bank of the River Thames, where no
conceivable peaceful protest could possibly interfere with access of
MPs to Parliament .

See Is the SOCPA Designated Area actually bigger than we have assumed ?

There are plenty of other laws which deal with any threats of
violence or any actual violence, which have applied since before the
SOCPA section 132 legislation came into force, so “security” has never
been enhanced by this legislation.

In our Managing Protest consultation response” we suggested that

If Section 138 is not repealed, then the Designated Area
should be reduced in size to cover just the pavement and highway
immediately outside and across the road from the entrances and exits to
Parliamentary Estate buildings.

i.e. Bridge Street, Parliament Street, Old Palace Yard, Abingdon
Street, Victoria Embankment (but only along the side of Portcullis
House and the Norman Shaw Buildings)

The interior “public spaces” of the main Palace of Westminster and Portcullis House should not be included in such a reduced Designated Area as this has already inhibited the proper democratic working of Parliament
by dissuading some members of the public from attending public sessions
of Select Committee meetings and in meeting their MPs in person in
Central Lobby or visiting the Public Gallery etc.

HatTip Parliament Protest

I believe that a future Libertarian Government would in any case repeal the Serious Organised Crime and Police Act 2005, and abolish what is in effect the Home Secretary's personal political police force.

To learn more of Libertarian Party policies, visit the LPUK website.

The Libertarian Party manifesto is based upon the premise of the Rule of Law. The concept of The Rule of Law is distinct from just being ruled by
laws.

The Rule of Law encompasses, amongst other things, property
rights, due process, equality and transparency. It also includes the
notion that there should be as few laws as possible, and that those
that do exist should be simple, clear and predictable in their
application.