Gordon Brown today admitted the Government cannot promise to keep
safe the millions of pieces of sensitive personal information it has
gathered on the British public.

The Prime Minister's remarks came
amid an urgent inquiry into how a memory stick with user names and
passwords for a key Whitehall computer system was found in a pub car
park, James Slack writes in the Daily Mail:.

Mr Brown said:

'It is important to recognise that we cannot promise
that every single item of information will always be safe because
mistakes are made by human beings. Mistakes are made in the
transportation, if you like the communication of information.'

This dovetails in quite nicely with his declaration before a court in February that Labour's Manifesto pledges are worthless, that they are not subject to legitimate expectation.

So they lied to you about their agenda, and they have now admitted that they lied to you about being able to keep all your personal data safe.

In fact, they have made false representations which is fraud.


The Libertarian Party said that as a first step the £4.5 billion ID cards scheme should now be scrapped immediately.

Other
major projects that need to be scrapped include a £12.7bn NHS NPfIT system for the
electronic storage and sharing of patients' records, ContactPoint – a database containing sensitive details about every
child in the country, due to be launched next year, and the £12bn Central Database holding details of every
phone call, text message, email or website visited by every person in
the UK to name but a few.

The Libertarian Party is committed to scrapping all of the intrusive databases that the government operate or are planning, including the ANPR database, the National DNA database (except for those who have been convicted of serious crime), the national fingerprint database (except for those who have been convicted of serious crime), the PNR (passenger name record database), the HIPS database and the Work and Pensions Longitudinal Study (WPLS) which links tax records with social security, benefit, pension, ISA, TESSA, PEP and other investment information with names and addresses and national insurance information.

It has also emerged that a public official is sacked or reprimanded
almost every working day for data protection or other personal
information breaches.

Parliamentary answers received from four
Government departments alone reveal that at least 230 officials were
disciplined or dismissed in the last year for inappropriate handling of
sensitive data.

Analysis of reports of data breach notifications
reveals the Government has lost the personal information of nearly 30
million people in the last year.

It is not good enough that Government collect this data initially, and now it is clear that the Government cannot safeguard your data, and Gordon Brown's admission today only confirms that.

The Libertarian Party view is that Government should therefore not collect this data in the first place.

There IS another way!

The
Libertarian
Party
is the only party that has promised to put an end to this Politics of
Fear, scrap all these intrusive databases, and repeal the many thousands of draconian laws enacted over the past
11
years.


The Only home of Libertarian policy in the UK

Your Life, Your Country, Your Choice.

Gordon Brown today admitted the Government cannot promise to keep
safe the millions of pieces of sensitive personal information it has
gathered on the British public.

The Prime Minister's remarks came
amid an urgent inquiry into how a memory stick with user names and
passwords for a key Whitehall computer system was found in a pub car
park, James Slack writes in the Daily Mail:.

Mr Brown said:

'It is important to recognise that we cannot promise
that every single item of information will always be safe because
mistakes are made by human beings. Mistakes are made in the
transportation, if you like the communication of information.'

This dovetails in quite nicely with his declaration before a court in February that Labour's Manifesto pledges are worthless, that they are not subject to legitimate expectation.

So they lied to you about their agenda, and they have now admitted that they lied to you about being able to keep all your personal data safe.

In fact, they have made false representations which is fraud.


The Libertarian Party said that as a first step the £4.5 billion ID cards scheme should now be scrapped immediately.

Other
major projects that need to be scrapped include a £12.7bn NHS NPfIT system for the
electronic storage and sharing of patients' records, ContactPoint – a database containing sensitive details about every
child in the country, due to be launched next year, and the £12bn Central Database holding details of every
phone call, text message, email or website visited by every person in
the UK to name but a few.

The Libertarian Party is committed to scrapping all of the intrusive databases that the government operate or are planning, including the ANPR database, the National DNA database (except for those who have been convicted of serious crime), the national fingerprint database (except for those who have been convicted of serious crime), the PNR (passenger name record database), the HIPS database and the Work and Pensions Longitudinal Study (WPLS) which links tax records with social security, benefit, pension, ISA, TESSA, PEP and other investment information with names and addresses and national insurance information.

It has also emerged that a public official is sacked or reprimanded
almost every working day for data protection or other personal
information breaches.

Parliamentary answers received from four
Government departments alone reveal that at least 230 officials were
disciplined or dismissed in the last year for inappropriate handling of
sensitive data.

Analysis of reports of data breach notifications
reveals the Government has lost the personal information of nearly 30
million people in the last year.

It is not good enough that Government collect this data initially, and now it is clear that the Government cannot safeguard your data, and Gordon Brown's admission today only confirms that.

The Libertarian Party view is that Government should therefore not collect this data in the first place.

There IS another way!

The
Libertarian
Party
is the only party that has promised to put an end to this Politics of
Fear, scrap all these intrusive databases, and repeal the many thousands of draconian laws enacted over the past
11
years.


The Only home of Libertarian policy in the UK

Your Life, Your Country, Your Choice.

Tom Harris, MP has focused on a term used during a new fundament ripping session that has occurred as a result of his contemptuous response to receiving a copy of George Orwell's “1984″ as part of the LPUK campaign.

Roger Thornhill used it in the original thread (above), then Old Holborn – for it was he – used it again in Tom's follow-up thread here.
OH:
“Again, I state, there are but 646 of you. Don’t you EVER forget it,
because it wasn’t that long ago that we really did hang politicians.
And Ceau?escu moments will always happen.”

TH: How pompous can
any individual actually get? So, are you threatening
democratically-elected politicians with murder just because we don’t do
what you and your small band of fanatics in the Libertarian Party want
us to do?

Tom old bean, ”Ceau?escu Moment” refers to when a cruel and oppressive dictator thinks the oppressed masses crowds are cheering, then suddenly realises they are rioting.
Some might say you already knew that but wished to play the “loony” card, but I could not possibly comment.

Hattip NeueArbeit Macht Frei

Tom Harris, MP has focused on a term used during a new fundament ripping session that has occurred as a result of his contemptuous response to receiving a copy of George Orwell's “1984″ as part of the LPUK campaign.

Roger Thornhill used it in the original thread (above), then Old Holborn – for it was he – used it again in Tom's follow-up thread here.
OH:
“Again, I state, there are but 646 of you. Don’t you EVER forget it,
because it wasn’t that long ago that we really did hang politicians.
And Ceau?escu moments will always happen.”

TH: How pompous can
any individual actually get? So, are you threatening
democratically-elected politicians with murder just because we don’t do
what you and your small band of fanatics in the Libertarian Party want
us to do?

Tom old bean, ”Ceau?escu Moment” refers to when a cruel and oppressive dictator thinks the oppressed masses crowds are cheering, then suddenly realises they are rioting.
Some might say you already knew that but wished to play the “loony” card, but I could not possibly comment.

Hattip NeueArbeit Macht Frei

James Purnell has broken the law, not just rules or guidelines.

It is said
that a fish starts to rot from the head first, so it comes as no
surprise that the ambitious, arrogant, yet inept, Government Minister
with direct responsibility for the Government Gateway passwords etc. USB memory device scandal
(see the immediately previous Spy Blog article) is James Purnell, the
former Labour party apparatchik and now Secretary of State for Work and
Pensions.

The Sunday Mirror reports that:

Work and Pensions Secretary James Purnell leaves red box secrets on train

By Kelly Jenkins and Vincent Moss, Political Editor 2/11/2008

CABINET Minister James Purnell has sparked a security row after losing confidential documents on a packed train.

The rising Labour star – tipped as a future PM – broke strict guidelines by taking documents out of his “red box” on the trip.

Ministers are warned against taking their Cabinet briefcases on
public transport amid fears secret papers could be lost or stolen.

The embarrassing gaffe comes days after civil servant Richard
Jackson was fined for leaving top secret documents relating to al-Qaeda
and Iraq on a train.

Shocked passengers told how Work and Pensions Secretary Mr Purnell
left his red box wide open while he wandered around the train making
calls on his mobile.

To make matters worse, the 38-year-old then raced off the train, leaving a file of documents behind.

When can we be rid of such dangerously incompetent and arrogant people from positions of trust and power?

Among the private letters was one about the plight of Wayne Bowers, including his name, address and national insurance number.

He was furious last night when told of Mr Purnell's carelessness.

Jobless Mr Bowers, 35, from Manchester had asked for help from his MP Gerald Kaufman to sort out a benefit claim.

Mr Purnell's reply to Mr Kaufman was among documents left on the train.

An outraged Mr Bowers said: “I feel violated. To think that my
personal details are in a letter a minister just leaves lying around on
a train beggars belief. This is confidential information. It's out of
order and I deserve an apology.”

A personal, public apology from James Purnell would be fair, but, given his attitude, it seems unlikely.

Hopefully the electorate will punish him for his arrogance and incompetence.

Mr Purnell was travelling first class on the Virgin Pendolino 9.06am
service from Macclesfield, Cheshire, to Euston, London, on October 4.

Fellow travellers said Mr Purnell thought nothing of emptying his
ministerial box on to the table in front of him. He also left the red
box – marked with the words Secretary of State. Department of Work and
Pensions – unlocked and with papers on the table.

One fellow traveller told the Sunday Mirror: “We recognised him straight away and he seemed to be showing off a bit.

“He kept leaving the box and walking in and out of the carriage talking on his mobile.

“I think he realised people knew who he was and was playing the big man. His behaviour was unbelievable. He was very arrogant.”

Arrogant, incompetent and criminally negligent with the public's private data – a typical Labour Cabinet Minister.

Some astonished passengers took photos and videoed Mr Purnell's red box as it lay unguarded in the carriage.

As the train pulled into Euston, Mr Purnell hurriedly pulled his papers together and rushed off.

Two women – on a business trip to France – picked up the documents he had left behind on the floor.

They tried to find Mr Purnell, but he had disappeared so they had to take the file to Paris with them.

Once there, one of the women tried to inform the authorities they
had found government papers, but no one would take her seriously.

She said: “Even when I telephoned Mr Purnell's department in London I was told that nothing had gone missing.

That obviously highlights some incompetence or deliberate lies,

“In the end we simply put all the documents together and got them back to London early in the new week.”

It took three days for the papers to find their way back to Mr Purnell's Whitehall HQ.

Last night, Mr Purnell denied he had been using his red box recklessly or was guilty of losing crucial info.

His spokesman said: “It was one file from an MP with the attached correspondence and was returned safely within three days.

“Obviously, James is very sorry for the mistake. He has not broken any rules or guidelines.”

Very sorry that he got caught, probably.

James Purnell has broken the law, not just rules or guidelines.

The Data Protection Act 1998 applies to paper correspondence as well
as to electronic documents, and specifically covers sensitive personal
information, such as that of the MP's constituent.

The Official Secrets Act 1989 section 8 Safeguarding of information, specifically applies to a “Crown servant “, a term which includes a Cabinet Minister.

Former Cabinet minister Peter Kilfoyle set out guidelines on carrying red boxes in 1999.

He said: “Where it is necessary to carry red boxes by public transport, they should be effectively disguised.”

One former minister said: “It seems he has been very careless.”

With two such massive breaches in trust and security and privacy in
his department, one of which he was personally responsible for, any
Minister with any honour would offer his resignation,.

Will James Purnell resign with honour, or will he try to hang on to his position of power ?

Keyword Criminal

Hattip Spyblog