PJC Journal – Original

Hard Rain Journal 9-19-07: Your Name is Andrew Meyer

By Richard Power

If you give a damn, your name is Andrew Meyer, and you are under arrest.

I do not care who Meyer is, or what he thinks. I know what I saw with my own eyes.

Here's the bottom line:

During
the question and answer period of public event on a major university
campus in the USA, a student asked three questions of John Kerry, a
powerful member of the U.S. Senate:

1. Why didn't you challenge the results of the 2004 election?

2. Why haven't impeachment hearings begun?

3. Are you a member of Skull and Bones.

Meyer was articulate. He did not use profanity or abusive language.

He only took a couple of minutes to frame his questions. He was challenging, but not confrontational.

Before he could get an answer, he was approached by campus police. His microphone was cut off.

He was dragged to the entrance of the auditorium, where he was forced to the ground, physically restrained and then tazed.

Why did the campus police approach him? Why did they cut off his microphone? Why was he forcibly removed from the auditorium?

They didn't like his questions. What other explanation is there?

Meyer was arrested for a thought crime.

He was not tazed for resisting arrest, he was tazed for refusing to be silenced.

The video is disturbing in several ways.

The aggressive over-reaction of the campus police is disturbing.

It
is also disturbing to see most of the audience sit passively, staring
straight ahead while this brutal incident unfolds in their presence,
despite the young man's screaming,

But the most disturbing
element is the way in which Kerry drones on, while a young man he had
been conversing with is dragged away, screaming.

Disturbing yes, surprising no.

John
Kerry did not defend the African American voters who stood in the cold
dark rain to elect him President of the United States in 2004.

He did not even defend himself when he was swift-boated earlier on in 2004.

The sad truth is that John Kerry just wants the sad truth to go away.

But it won't.

Hundreds of thousands of people have already seen this video on-line.

That's speaking sad truth to sick power.

If you give a damn, your name is Andrew Meyer, and you are under arrest.

And John Kerry?

John Kerry has swift-boated himself (again).

Don't get me wrong. I fought for Kerry in 2004, I defended Kerry, I sent him money, and, of course, I voted for him.

The swift-boat ads run against him were lies.

But
this sad truth is there on the Internet for all to see, just as his
abandonment of the US electorate in 2004 is an historical fact that
stands for all to see.

Here's the video, watch it for yourself, and then give Sen. Kerry a call, as Mal contends of the Daily Kos suggests:

Watch this video

The Kerry Response:

• “The Senator acted appropriately … “
• Mr. Meyer “wanted this to happen … “

Just wait for it to happen in the UK, perhaps at the Labour Party Conference.

Hard Rain Journal 9-19-07: Your Name is Andrew Meyer

By Richard Power

If you give a damn, your name is Andrew Meyer, and you are under arrest.

I do not care who Meyer is, or what he thinks. I know what I saw with my own eyes.

Here's the bottom line:

During
the question and answer period of public event on a major university
campus in the USA, a student asked three questions of John Kerry, a
powerful member of the U.S. Senate:

1. Why didn't you challenge the results of the 2004 election?

2. Why haven't impeachment hearings begun?

3. Are you a member of Skull and Bones.

Meyer was articulate. He did not use profanity or abusive language.

He only took a couple of minutes to frame his questions. He was challenging, but not confrontational.

Before he could get an answer, he was approached by campus police. His microphone was cut off.

He was dragged to the entrance of the auditorium, where he was forced to the ground, physically restrained and then tazed.

Why did the campus police approach him? Why did they cut off his microphone? Why was he forcibly removed from the auditorium?

They didn't like his questions. What other explanation is there?

Meyer was arrested for a thought crime.

He was not tazed for resisting arrest, he was tazed for refusing to be silenced.

The video is disturbing in several ways.

The aggressive over-reaction of the campus police is disturbing.

It
is also disturbing to see most of the audience sit passively, staring
straight ahead while this brutal incident unfolds in their presence,
despite the young man's screaming,

But the most disturbing
element is the way in which Kerry drones on, while a young man he had
been conversing with is dragged away, screaming.

Disturbing yes, surprising no.

John
Kerry did not defend the African American voters who stood in the cold
dark rain to elect him President of the United States in 2004.

He did not even defend himself when he was swift-boated earlier on in 2004.

The sad truth is that John Kerry just wants the sad truth to go away.

But it won't.

Hundreds of thousands of people have already seen this video on-line.

That's speaking sad truth to sick power.

If you give a damn, your name is Andrew Meyer, and you are under arrest.

And John Kerry?

John Kerry has swift-boated himself (again).

Don't get me wrong. I fought for Kerry in 2004, I defended Kerry, I sent him money, and, of course, I voted for him.

The swift-boat ads run against him were lies.

But
this sad truth is there on the Internet for all to see, just as his
abandonment of the US electorate in 2004 is an historical fact that
stands for all to see.

Here's the video, watch it for yourself, and then give Sen. Kerry a call, as Mal contends of the Daily Kos suggests:

Watch this video

The Kerry Response:

• “The Senator acted appropriately … “
• Mr. Meyer “wanted this to happen … “

Just wait for it to happen in the UK, perhaps at the Labour Party Conference.

A quote from Paul Mcmullan in The People, 16 September 2007

Picturesque Cherbourg in Normandy has been overrun by thugs […]
Police chiefs and the ferry firms claim they are powerless to cope with
hordes of aggressive young men from Iraq, Iran, Syria and Afghanistan
who…
Break into camper vans armed with knives to force their way on board ferries.
Sneak into the backs of British caravans and car boots.
Co-ordinate raids on lorries by mobile phone.
Throw rocks and pull knives on anyone near their tented city.

[...] Cherbourg police chief Brigadier Anne-Sophie Renan admitted to The People:
“The Iraqi asylum seekers are extremely aggressive. [...]” Many of the
asylum seekers claim to be escaping the carnage in Iraq and Afghanistan
but their taste for violence would make them handy recruits for the
Taliban. [...] The tented camps are less than 50 miles from beaches
where British troops fought their way ashore on D-Day in the Second
World War.

When our investigator asked one man why he needed to go to Britain
when he was already on safe European soil he replied: “I have been
turned down in France. The English are soft and stupid and give me a
flat, money and new clothes and food.” Moments after the remark that
disgraced the sacrifices of British troops, our man had to flee a fresh
bombardment of rocks.

(source Brussels Journal.)

Perhaps they all want to go to Cambridgeshire. and perhaps Gordon will call upon the services of the EGF paramilitary police to help.

If the French can turn them down, why can't we ???

If we let these thugs in, then Brown's government have no excuse for not letting the Iraqi Interpreters come to Britain, they at least have put their lives on the line for us.

What we are seeing is the 'Onus of responsibility' in action.

By asking whether the Iraqi Interpreters can come to Britain, the onus of responsibility is on those making the request to prove that they have good reason to come to Britain and can be turned down.
But by being a thug and coming to Britain illegally, the onus of responsibility falls upon the British Government to justify kicking them out, which the HRA says we cannot do.

Britain – Where good law abiding citizens get shat on by the law and government every day.
Britain – Where illegality pays.

NuLab – Destroying Britain from the inside out.

A quote from Paul Mcmullan in The People, 16 September 2007

Picturesque Cherbourg in Normandy has been overrun by thugs […]
Police chiefs and the ferry firms claim they are powerless to cope with
hordes of aggressive young men from Iraq, Iran, Syria and Afghanistan
who…
Break into camper vans armed with knives to force their way on board ferries.
Sneak into the backs of British caravans and car boots.
Co-ordinate raids on lorries by mobile phone.
Throw rocks and pull knives on anyone near their tented city.

[...] Cherbourg police chief Brigadier Anne-Sophie Renan admitted to The People:
“The Iraqi asylum seekers are extremely aggressive. [...]” Many of the
asylum seekers claim to be escaping the carnage in Iraq and Afghanistan
but their taste for violence would make them handy recruits for the
Taliban. [...] The tented camps are less than 50 miles from beaches
where British troops fought their way ashore on D-Day in the Second
World War.

When our investigator asked one man why he needed to go to Britain
when he was already on safe European soil he replied: “I have been
turned down in France. The English are soft and stupid and give me a
flat, money and new clothes and food.” Moments after the remark that
disgraced the sacrifices of British troops, our man had to flee a fresh
bombardment of rocks.

(source Brussels Journal.)

Perhaps they all want to go to Cambridgeshire. and perhaps Gordon will call upon the services of the EGF paramilitary police to help.

If the French can turn them down, why can't we ???

If we let these thugs in, then Brown's government have no excuse for not letting the Iraqi Interpreters come to Britain, they at least have put their lives on the line for us.

What we are seeing is the 'Onus of responsibility' in action.

By asking whether the Iraqi Interpreters can come to Britain, the onus of responsibility is on those making the request to prove that they have good reason to come to Britain and can be turned down.
But by being a thug and coming to Britain illegally, the onus of responsibility falls upon the British Government to justify kicking them out, which the HRA says we cannot do.

Britain – Where good law abiding citizens get shat on by the law and government every day.
Britain – Where illegality pays.

NuLab – Destroying Britain from the inside out.