In the UK the government have issued rules to recruitment agencies that they must collect proof of identity by way of copies of passports and driving licences before the agency can work on your behalf, same rules apply with corporate HR.
If ever there was a half baked idea and an invitation to phishers and scam merchants this has got to be it, rules that ID cards will only provide assistance to the scammers.

Tim Wilson, Site Editor, Dark Reading has come up with this report on the dangers of providing personal details and copies of your passport to recruiters.

You think you may have found your next job. The online
recruiter seems to like you, and the salary sounds fantastic. You spoke
to the recruiter on the phone, and he's offered to fly you overseas for
an interview. In fact, you faxed him a copy of your passport so that he
could get you a ticket.

But now you find out his phone and fax have been disconnected,
and he doesn't answer his email. You call the company headquarters, and
they say they've never heard of him. He and the job opportunity have
both disappeared — along with your passport, and potentially, your
identity.

Think such a scam sounds far-fetched? Think again. Researchers at
Cyveillance and Monster.com are warning enterprises and prospective
employees that this very scenario is happening with greater frequency
than ever — and they're taking steps to stop it.

“It's really a type of phishing, though it probably needs its own
name,” says Terry Gudaitis, director of cybersecurity at Cyveillance.
“We're seeing a growing number of phishers using the names of
multinational enterprises and online recruiting sites to scam users
into giving up their personal information, just as they do with banks
and financial institutions.”

Cyveillance, a service that searches the Web for risky or
suspicious behavior by employees, prospects, and brand thieves, has
been monitoring the exploit for some time, and law enforcement agencies
are “very aware” of it, Gudaitis says. Cyveillance yesterday announced
that it has signed a contract to help Monster.com detect the misuse of
its brand, and to help stop this recruiting fraud.

“In the same way that Microsoft and AOL have helped users to
detect and block URLs that are associated with traditional phishing
attacks, we're partnering with Monster to find and block these
recruiting scams, not just on Monster.com, but on other sites as well,”
Gudaitis says.

The recruiter scams take many forms, but the phisher usually
starts with a spam message or by placing an ad on a job hunting site
such as Monster.com, Cyveillance says. The phisher typically represents
himself as a recruiter for a well-known multinational firm and requests
personal information such as name, address, and Social Security number.

But in some cases, the phisher goes beyond this initial scam and
actually speaks to the user on the phone, Gudaitis says. Posing as a
human resources representative or a headhunter, the phisher might go as
far as to do an initial interview of a prospective employee — and then
invite the victim for an in-person interview at the company's overseas
headquarters.

The phisher will then ask the victim to fax a copy of a driver's license or passport — and then disappear.

“This is a risky approach for the attacker, because they have to
give a phone and fax number, then get the information and pick up and
move before they're detected,” Gudaitis observes. “But a photocopy of a
passport is pretty valuable — in most countries, you can go to an
embassy and get a new passport if you have a copy of the old one.”

Such attacks also can be more difficult to detect immediately,
Gudaitis notes. “In traditional phishing, event A usually results in
action B — you give up your credit card number, and someone else uses
it,” she says. “But in the case of recruiting fraud, someone might be
using your passport halfway around the world, and you might never know
it.”

Recruiting fraud also has more potential to spread than, say,
banking fraud. “Just about every company posts jobs online, either
through its own site or through a site like Monster,” Gudaitis
observes. “So this sort of thing could happen to any company in any
industry.”

Companies should stay vigilant about the use of their names on
the Web, and they should set policies on how they communicate with
prospective employees so that attacks which deviate from those policies
are easier to detect, advises Todd Bransford, vice president of
marketing at Cyveillance. Cyveillance uses Web crawlers and researchers
to detect the use of a company's name — or the names of its favorite
recruiting firms — in recruiting scams.

Related Reading:


In the UK the government have issued rules to recruitment agencies that they must collect proof of identity by way of copies of passports and driving licences before the agency can work on your behalf, same rules apply with corporate HR.
If ever there was a half baked idea and an invitation to phishers and scam merchants this has got to be it, rules that ID cards will only provide assistance to the scammers.

Tim Wilson, Site Editor, Dark Reading has come up with this report on the dangers of providing personal details and copies of your passport to recruiters.

You think you may have found your next job. The online
recruiter seems to like you, and the salary sounds fantastic. You spoke
to the recruiter on the phone, and he's offered to fly you overseas for
an interview. In fact, you faxed him a copy of your passport so that he
could get you a ticket.

But now you find out his phone and fax have been disconnected,
and he doesn't answer his email. You call the company headquarters, and
they say they've never heard of him. He and the job opportunity have
both disappeared — along with your passport, and potentially, your
identity.

Think such a scam sounds far-fetched? Think again. Researchers at
Cyveillance and Monster.com are warning enterprises and prospective
employees that this very scenario is happening with greater frequency
than ever — and they're taking steps to stop it.

“It's really a type of phishing, though it probably needs its own
name,” says Terry Gudaitis, director of cybersecurity at Cyveillance.
“We're seeing a growing number of phishers using the names of
multinational enterprises and online recruiting sites to scam users
into giving up their personal information, just as they do with banks
and financial institutions.”

Cyveillance, a service that searches the Web for risky or
suspicious behavior by employees, prospects, and brand thieves, has
been monitoring the exploit for some time, and law enforcement agencies
are “very aware” of it, Gudaitis says. Cyveillance yesterday announced
that it has signed a contract to help Monster.com detect the misuse of
its brand, and to help stop this recruiting fraud.

“In the same way that Microsoft and AOL have helped users to
detect and block URLs that are associated with traditional phishing
attacks, we're partnering with Monster to find and block these
recruiting scams, not just on Monster.com, but on other sites as well,”
Gudaitis says.

The recruiter scams take many forms, but the phisher usually
starts with a spam message or by placing an ad on a job hunting site
such as Monster.com, Cyveillance says. The phisher typically represents
himself as a recruiter for a well-known multinational firm and requests
personal information such as name, address, and Social Security number.

But in some cases, the phisher goes beyond this initial scam and
actually speaks to the user on the phone, Gudaitis says. Posing as a
human resources representative or a headhunter, the phisher might go as
far as to do an initial interview of a prospective employee — and then
invite the victim for an in-person interview at the company's overseas
headquarters.

The phisher will then ask the victim to fax a copy of a driver's license or passport — and then disappear.

“This is a risky approach for the attacker, because they have to
give a phone and fax number, then get the information and pick up and
move before they're detected,” Gudaitis observes. “But a photocopy of a
passport is pretty valuable — in most countries, you can go to an
embassy and get a new passport if you have a copy of the old one.”

Such attacks also can be more difficult to detect immediately,
Gudaitis notes. “In traditional phishing, event A usually results in
action B — you give up your credit card number, and someone else uses
it,” she says. “But in the case of recruiting fraud, someone might be
using your passport halfway around the world, and you might never know
it.”

Recruiting fraud also has more potential to spread than, say,
banking fraud. “Just about every company posts jobs online, either
through its own site or through a site like Monster,” Gudaitis
observes. “So this sort of thing could happen to any company in any
industry.”

Companies should stay vigilant about the use of their names on
the Web, and they should set policies on how they communicate with
prospective employees so that attacks which deviate from those policies
are easier to detect, advises Todd Bransford, vice president of
marketing at Cyveillance. Cyveillance uses Web crawlers and researchers
to detect the use of a company's name — or the names of its favorite
recruiting firms — in recruiting scams.

Related Reading:

When a serving police officer is willing to say in guarded terms that enough is enough, that our justice system is no longer fit for purpose, then we really do have to listen.

Inspector Gadget sadly says what most of us already know.

He knows that there is only so much the public is willing to take, that one day there will be a backlash, when he says: 'whatever liberty this kind of system protects is starting to come at too high a price'.

NuLab – Destroying Britain from the inside out.

So we can agree that the forthcoming EU treaty is going to be a big
serious thing for the future of our countries. And we can also agree
that elected politicians hold the power they wield, at least
theoretically in trust. So what can a concerned citizen do about the
thought that the European political elites have decided both singularly
and pluraly to disenfranchise their populations by driving ahead with
the Constitution, despite its explicit rejection in referenda?

Well this is something.

In a novel experience England Expects is going to a joint venture with the proprietor of the Devil's Kitchen. Today they have written to every MP the following letter,

“Dear Member of Parliament,

In
mid-October, the EU aims to have finished writing the Reform Treaty
which will signed by Gordon Brown at the EU Summit in December. Mr
Brown has repeatedly refused to honour the Labour Government's
manifesto commitment to hold a referendum on the proposed Constitution,
which nearly all informed Continental observers agree, the Reform
Treaty is in substance.

According top a recent ICM Poll (21 June
2007), overall 86% of voters want a referendum.83% of Labour voters
want a vote to be held on the text, as do 88% of Lib-Dem and Tory
voters.88% of trade union members want a referendum.

We are
running a research program into elected MPs' and selected PPCs'
attitudes towards a referendum, and the results will be displayed on a
searchable website: ReferendumList.org

Our questions to you are as follows:

1. Do you support the people's call for a Referendum on the EU Treaty?
2. Will you actively call for and support a referendum in the House of Commons?

If
an MP does not reply, it will be assumed that they are not in favour of
a referendum and that they are in favour of Parliamentary ratification
only.

Yours sincerely,

Chris Mounsey
Gawain Towler
ReferendumList.org

So if you want to know what they are up to, whether they follow their respective party lines and so on then come along to ReferendumList and find out.

In
the following weeks we will also be writing to all declared candidates
so that, in the event of an early election the constituents will be
appraised of the views of the candidates grubbing for their votes.

So please take on of the buttons to put on your websites, let people know and use this resource as well as you wish.

The Department for Transport said the evidence of a parking attendant
would be regarded as sufficient and the onus would be on the motorist
to prove that he or she was not parked illegally.

Millions more motorists could receive parking fines after the
Government said that the tickets will no longer have to be fixed to the
windscreen.

The new regulations are part of a shake-up that will
include two-tier parking fines with those guilty of more serious
transgressions, such as parking in a disabled bay or on double yellow
lines, facing higher penalties.

The changes are
designed to plug a loophole identified by the National Parking
Adjudication Service, which handles motorists' appeals outside London.

In
its annual report, it ruled that tickets had to be properly issued and
it disallowed one penalty charge notice after the parking attendant
hurled it through the car window of a disappearing motorist. The new
rules, which will be enforced in about 180 authorities outside London,
will not even require traffic wardens to provide photographic proof
that the car was parked illegally.

The Department for Transport also confirmed that regulations outlawing
laser and speed camera detectors will come into force by early 2008. (source)

We know that many Traffic Wardens issue tickets to meet their bonus targets, that local authorities depend on the revenues from traffic tickets and write them into their annual budgets, and this can only be seen as another way to increase those revenues, and is clearly open to the most severe abuse.

Traffic Wardens now have more power than a Judge, being able to issue tickets that result in fines without having to provide any evidence or to prove that an offence even took place. This is surely contrary to the Bill of Rights 1689, and needs to be tested in the courts very soon.

Another nail in the coffin of fair justice.

Englishmen are now Guilty until proven Innocent.

The inmates are definitely now running the asylum.

NuLab – Destroying Britain from the inside out.