This report has been spotted in Eurosoc.

Whilst I cannot agree with Press scaremongering, this report does appear to have attributed statements and is specifically clear in its message.

It is therefore strange that the UK press have given little regard to this, or that the Home Office fails to mention it.

Given its apparent gravitas, I am sure that the Home Office could have announced this in such a way not to cause any widespread fears or panic, a manner in which the general public would be a little more aware.
Very different from the generalised scare stories of earlier this year, which were then followed up by a statement to say that there was no specific threat. Not so with this.

A security analyst told British MPs that Iran has been
scouting for targets in Europe, including nuclear power stations and
major cities.

Claude Moniquet, director of the European Strategic Intelligence and Security Centre
said that “We have serious signals that something is under preparation
in Europe… Iranian intelligence is working extremely hard to prepare
its people and to prepare actions.”

Moniquet said that there is evidence of increased numbers of Iranian
agents at work in Europe, possibly planning to target “British citizens
on the streets of London… just as they kill British soldiers in the
south of Iraq.”

The meeting with MPs from all parties took place in the British
House of Commons this week. Conservative MP Patrick Mercer told
colleagues that Foreign Secretary Margaret Beckett “had acknowledged
worries about Tehran backing terrorist activity inside Britain” in a
debate last year. The UK's Security and Intelligence Committee, which
reviews the work of MI5 and MI6 had also warned “worries about Tehran
backing terrorist activity inside Britain.”

However, government security officials later attempted to soothe
concerns. One told reporters that while it is certain that Iranian
agents are conducting espionage on potential military and industrial
targets within the UK, there is no verification of claims that nuclear
power plants are among the targets, or that more agents are on the
ground (phew, that's ok then).

He added that the election of President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad raised
expectations that more spies would be sent to Britain and Europe, but
“it is not clear” if that has been the case.

Strangely, the report is given scant coverage in the British press,
but makes the headlines in the US and Australia. In Britain, the Glasgow Herald
gives it serious coverage, including a quote from MP Mercer that Iran
and Britain were engaged in “an undeclared war.” The Telegraph adds
Moniquet's warning almost as a footnote to Conservative leader David
Cameron's warning on Iran's nuclear programme (where tough guy Cameron
gets the opportunity to bluster that he wouldn't rule out military
action against Iran). The Guardian doesn't mention it at all.

Moniquet's organisation is described by the Telegraph
as “a Right-wing Brussels think-tank”. Associated Press prefers
“private think-tank”. Is the Telegraph now following the BBC protocol
whereby right-wing organisations must be identified as such, while
leftist groups are held as neutral observers?

ESISC deals with European intelligence agencies in its research.

(source)

This report has been spotted in Eurosoc.

Whilst I cannot agree with Press scaremongering, this report does appear to have attributed statements and is specifically clear in its message.

It is therefore strange that the UK press have given little regard to this, or that the Home Office fails to mention it.

Given its apparent gravitas, I am sure that the Home Office could have announced this in such a way not to cause any widespread fears or panic, a manner in which the general public would be a little more aware.
Very different from the generalised scare stories of earlier this year, which were then followed up by a statement to say that there was no specific threat. Not so with this.

A security analyst told British MPs that Iran has been
scouting for targets in Europe, including nuclear power stations and
major cities.

Claude Moniquet, director of the European Strategic Intelligence and Security Centre
said that “We have serious signals that something is under preparation
in Europe… Iranian intelligence is working extremely hard to prepare
its people and to prepare actions.”

Moniquet said that there is evidence of increased numbers of Iranian
agents at work in Europe, possibly planning to target “British citizens
on the streets of London… just as they kill British soldiers in the
south of Iraq.”

The meeting with MPs from all parties took place in the British
House of Commons this week. Conservative MP Patrick Mercer told
colleagues that Foreign Secretary Margaret Beckett “had acknowledged
worries about Tehran backing terrorist activity inside Britain” in a
debate last year. The UK's Security and Intelligence Committee, which
reviews the work of MI5 and MI6 had also warned “worries about Tehran
backing terrorist activity inside Britain.”

However, government security officials later attempted to soothe
concerns. One told reporters that while it is certain that Iranian
agents are conducting espionage on potential military and industrial
targets within the UK, there is no verification of claims that nuclear
power plants are among the targets, or that more agents are on the
ground (phew, that's ok then).

He added that the election of President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad raised
expectations that more spies would be sent to Britain and Europe, but
“it is not clear” if that has been the case.

Strangely, the report is given scant coverage in the British press,
but makes the headlines in the US and Australia. In Britain, the Glasgow Herald
gives it serious coverage, including a quote from MP Mercer that Iran
and Britain were engaged in “an undeclared war.” The Telegraph adds
Moniquet's warning almost as a footnote to Conservative leader David
Cameron's warning on Iran's nuclear programme (where tough guy Cameron
gets the opportunity to bluster that he wouldn't rule out military
action against Iran). The Guardian doesn't mention it at all.

Moniquet's organisation is described by the Telegraph
as “a Right-wing Brussels think-tank”. Associated Press prefers
“private think-tank”. Is the Telegraph now following the BBC protocol
whereby right-wing organisations must be identified as such, while
leftist groups are held as neutral observers?

ESISC deals with European intelligence agencies in its research.

(source)

From a PJC Commenter sent in today.

I spent most of today in Birmingham at the NEC. I had primarily gone there to see the Health & Safety and the Fire Safety exhibitions. But alongside, and with free entry from the ticket that I already had, was one mounted by/for the security industry. It is called IPSEC. I wandered around this with steadily growing incredulity.

At one stand they were announcing their privacy enhanced CCTV.
The pictures on display were all pixellated, so that distinguishing features could not be readily discerned. Good for privacy I was told.

So I informed this foreign gentleman (Swiss) that his firm had backed a loser. The government were about to force systems operators to upgrade their installations, to give greater clarity of distinguishing features to the police (state), so deliberately downgrading would not be allowed.

Ah but, he replied, in our case all you have to do is to put the dongle back into the PC, and all is revealed in HDTV type clarity! And it was.

So, if this system were to be introduced, the public will be duped by the “privacy enhancement” when the state's backroom boys will all along have the PC dongle to permit real clear surveillance of their current targets.

This could be so devious that surely it is already on some Home Office hidden agenda somewhere, we just haven't been told about it yet!

And I continued to despond as I passed stand after stand telling me about how wonderfully they could manipulate CCTV images to extract number plate information, driver's face (car park “security” to check that the driver removing the vehicle is the same as the driver who parked it), movement, aggression, just hanging around, etc etc.

I finally had enough on a stand with an unmarked police car fitted with two very small forward facing cameras, one for the installed ANPR system and one just recording the general view.

I asked the rep who wandered over to me, how he could be content selling this stuff, considering that the nationwide ANPR scheme had not been approved by Parliament.

Hearing a rather determined note in my voice, he was swiftly joined by another from a large (probably in excess of 6) number of reps on the stand.

The outcome was that this somewhat larger rep assured me that he was all in favour of the technology because it worked, that I should direct all comments about the manner of its introduction to the government as he just sold the technology, and of course he slept well at night.

As I left the stand they were clearly having a ball. It was just hilarious that someone had challenged them on this topic, or in this way.

What I had missed was the opportunity to deliver the obvious (after the event) barb about plenty of people at Nurenburg discovering post 1945 that “just following orders” was insufficient as a defence.

But it wouldn't have made any difference. They just know that they are right. I think the quote is that “there are none so blind as those who will not see” (ie choose not to).

Sarkozy,
on his first visit to the European Commission on Wednesday, said: I
believe Turkey does not have its place in the EU and I haven't changed
my opinion.”

Sarkozy, who
replaced Jacques Chirac as president in the middle of May did not say
what France would do about ongoing EU membership negotiations with
Ankara which started in 2005.

He said his priority was the simplification of the EU's constitution treaty and that the groups was “making headway”.

Sarkozy
said he was now campaigning to unblock the impasse of what to do with
the constitution – notably on getting EU leaders to accept a
scaled-back, simplified EU treaty passed, and doing away with the
current draft constitution.

 

“We
need to move forward and a simplified treaty is the way forward …
Europe cannot remain at a standstill, we cannot remain in this relative
paralysis … we have to find a way out of this impasse,” he said.

 

The EU constitution was to have streamlined how the bloc makes decisions and bolster its role on the world stage.

 

Growing consensus

 

Sarkozy held talks with Jose Manuel Barroso, the European Commission president, at the EU headquarters in Brussels.
 
“We seem to be making headway on the way to a simplified treaty,” to replace the stalled EU constitution, Sarkozy said.
 
The constitution
needs the backing of all 27 EU nations for it to be ratified. French
and Dutch voters rejected it two years ago.

 

Some
EU nations, such as France, Britain and the Netherlands are now keen to
drop more contentious parts of the draft – its name, the post of an EU
foreign minister and officially designated anthem and flag – to play
down public fears that a constitution would take away powers from
national capitals and create a European superstate.

 

Barroso agreed that a “consensus is forming around” a toned-down EU treaty to replace the draft constitution.

 

Sarkozy's visit to Brussels
was only his second trip abroad as president – and was seen as a signal
that the new French leader plans to take a more hands-on approach to France's European policy than Chirac did during his 12 years in office.

 


French
officials said Sarkozy wants a “simplified” treaty to replace the
current constitution, doing away with notions that the existing charter
is a “solemn text”, as a way to avoid the need for new referendums.

(source)

Tony Blair must be crossing his fingers, hoping that they get this done before he leaves office so he can be named as the first unelected European Commission President.


Sarkozy,
on his first visit to the European Commission on Wednesday, said: I
believe Turkey does not have its place in the EU and I haven't changed
my opinion.”

Sarkozy, who
replaced Jacques Chirac as president in the middle of May did not say
what France would do about ongoing EU membership negotiations with
Ankara which started in 2005.

He said his priority was the simplification of the EU's constitution treaty and that the groups was “making headway”.

Sarkozy
said he was now campaigning to unblock the impasse of what to do with
the constitution – notably on getting EU leaders to accept a
scaled-back, simplified EU treaty passed, and doing away with the
current draft constitution.

 

“We
need to move forward and a simplified treaty is the way forward …
Europe cannot remain at a standstill, we cannot remain in this relative
paralysis … we have to find a way out of this impasse,” he said.

 

The EU constitution was to have streamlined how the bloc makes decisions and bolster its role on the world stage.

 

Growing consensus

 

Sarkozy held talks with Jose Manuel Barroso, the European Commission president, at the EU headquarters in Brussels.
 
“We seem to be making headway on the way to a simplified treaty,” to replace the stalled EU constitution, Sarkozy said.
 
The constitution
needs the backing of all 27 EU nations for it to be ratified. French
and Dutch voters rejected it two years ago.

 

Some
EU nations, such as France, Britain and the Netherlands are now keen to
drop more contentious parts of the draft – its name, the post of an EU
foreign minister and officially designated anthem and flag – to play
down public fears that a constitution would take away powers from
national capitals and create a European superstate.

 

Barroso agreed that a “consensus is forming around” a toned-down EU treaty to replace the draft constitution.

 

Sarkozy's visit to Brussels
was only his second trip abroad as president – and was seen as a signal
that the new French leader plans to take a more hands-on approach to France's European policy than Chirac did during his 12 years in office.

 


French
officials said Sarkozy wants a “simplified” treaty to replace the
current constitution, doing away with notions that the existing charter
is a “solemn text”, as a way to avoid the need for new referendums.

(source)

Tony Blair must be crossing his fingers, hoping that they get this done before he leaves office so he can be named as the first unelected European Commission President.