Tony Blair
is going to try and bullshit us about how well the government have reformed the
Health Service, whilst his Health Ministry Gestapo are deciding who and who
cannot have treatment. 

If you are fat
and obese or are a heavy smoker, forget it. The extra taxes that you have paid
with every pack of cigarettes wont count a jot, the £9.3 billion raised from
tobacco will just be spent elsewhere.

This
corrupt and bankrupt government are playing the game of the Nazi’s, where only
model citizens will be allowed government services. 

Patricia
Hewitt said “That is a perfectly legitimate clinical decision. I support
doctors making clinical decisions in the interests of their patients.'' – Sorry? Who's interests?

Its got to
be about as far away from a clinical decision as you can possibly get, and
forces doctors to break their oath. If any doctors agree with this policy, then
I have to ask them seriously, why are they doctors? 

Andrew
Lansley, the Tory health spokesman, said: “Trusts shouldn't have a policy
which excludes people from treatment because they either smoke or are
overweight, because treatments should be based on clinical needs.”

The NHS has
no right to turn away patients from services that it has been deigned to
provide unless there is a compelling medical case to the contrary. Every tax
payer in this country is compelled to pay National Insurance contributions
towards their healthcare, pension, and welfare benefits – the quid pro quo of
this is the State is obliged to provide services to each and everyone of the
people. That is written into statute law.

Sounds like failed Management Consultant Hewitt is confusing State and Government again!!

I am of a
mind to say that if I get refused health treatment, then I will refuse to pay
NI contributions, unless the government is willing to pay the premiums for
private health care for the non treatment on the NHS. 

We either
have a Health Service or we don’t, or we can make our feelings known on 3^rd
May.

(source)

 

NuLab
(National Socialists) – Destroying Britain from the inside out.

 

 

 

Tony Blair
is going to try and bullshit us about how well the government have reformed the
Health Service, whilst his Health Ministry Gestapo are deciding who and who
cannot have treatment. 

If you are fat
and obese or are a heavy smoker, forget it. The extra taxes that you have paid
with every pack of cigarettes wont count a jot, the £9.3 billion raised from
tobacco will just be spent elsewhere.

This
corrupt and bankrupt government are playing the game of the Nazi’s, where only
model citizens will be allowed government services. 

Patricia
Hewitt said “That is a perfectly legitimate clinical decision. I support
doctors making clinical decisions in the interests of their patients.'' – Sorry? Who's interests?

Its got to
be about as far away from a clinical decision as you can possibly get, and
forces doctors to break their oath. If any doctors agree with this policy, then
I have to ask them seriously, why are they doctors? 

Andrew
Lansley, the Tory health spokesman, said: “Trusts shouldn't have a policy
which excludes people from treatment because they either smoke or are
overweight, because treatments should be based on clinical needs.”

The NHS has
no right to turn away patients from services that it has been deigned to
provide unless there is a compelling medical case to the contrary. Every tax
payer in this country is compelled to pay National Insurance contributions
towards their healthcare, pension, and welfare benefits – the quid pro quo of
this is the State is obliged to provide services to each and everyone of the
people. That is written into statute law.

Sounds like failed Management Consultant Hewitt is confusing State and Government again!!

I am of a
mind to say that if I get refused health treatment, then I will refuse to pay
NI contributions, unless the government is willing to pay the premiums for
private health care for the non treatment on the NHS. 

We either
have a Health Service or we don’t, or we can make our feelings known on 3^rd
May.

(source)

 

NuLab
(National Socialists) – Destroying Britain from the inside out.

 

 

 

A proposal
to allow European police forces to share data undermines fundamental human
rights, the European Data Protection Supervisor said today.

The
European Council's proposal to extend data protection into police and judicial
matters was designed to ensure first that police managed their data properly,
but the German Presidency had “significantly weakened” the proposal's
protections so it could get the European Council to accept it by removing the
basic data protections that would necessitate it being managed properly in the
first place.

For example, it dropped the
proposal that countries be prevented from sharing data with others that don't
have adequate data protection. The principle that would ensure the quality of
police data has also been dropped, meaning there is no obligation on them to
distinguish the level of accuracy and reliability of the intelligence being
used, nor distinguish between different sorts of data subject such as
criminals, suspects, victims and witnesses.

Further, it removed the
limitations normally put on the uses to which data can be put, and that any
derogations from this rule should be “necessary, proportionate, precise
and foreseeable”.

Then there was no measure
to periodically purge the databases of duff and redundant data and no
obligation on the police to rectify any mistakes in the data they hold.

(source)

At a time when we need more protection the UK government has signed up to this
crap.

Welcome to the world of trial by corrupted
databases.

 

 

NuLab
(National Socialists) – Destroying Britain from the inside out.

 

A proposal
to allow European police forces to share data undermines fundamental human
rights, the European Data Protection Supervisor said today.

The
European Council's proposal to extend data protection into police and judicial
matters was designed to ensure first that police managed their data properly,
but the German Presidency had “significantly weakened” the proposal's
protections so it could get the European Council to accept it by removing the
basic data protections that would necessitate it being managed properly in the
first place.

For example, it dropped the
proposal that countries be prevented from sharing data with others that don't
have adequate data protection. The principle that would ensure the quality of
police data has also been dropped, meaning there is no obligation on them to
distinguish the level of accuracy and reliability of the intelligence being
used, nor distinguish between different sorts of data subject such as
criminals, suspects, victims and witnesses.

Further, it removed the
limitations normally put on the uses to which data can be put, and that any
derogations from this rule should be “necessary, proportionate, precise
and foreseeable”.

Then there was no measure
to periodically purge the databases of duff and redundant data and no
obligation on the police to rectify any mistakes in the data they hold.

(source)

At a time when we need more protection the UK government has signed up to this
crap.

Welcome to the world of trial by corrupted
databases.

 

 

NuLab
(National Socialists) – Destroying Britain from the inside out.

 

Declaration of Personal Identity. 

I (Ian Parker) declare that my personal Identity details (also known as my personal
data) relating to myself belong to me exclusively. (Me being the person so named and registered by
the relevant authority under the Births, Deaths and Marriages Act 1953).

 

Personal data includes but is not limited to:

 

Name, including any previous names.

Address, including any previous addresses.

Age, DOB.

Marital state.

Height,

Weight,

Skin Colour,

DNA, or any other bio
data,

Medical record.

Any Medical Condition,

Any medication that I may have been prescribed.

Details of what I purchase, (other than commodities or
substances for which government have detailed under Acts of Parliament as being
of an illegal or reportable nature).

Where I shop, (As above).

Banking details.

Passport details.

Credit Card details.

Driving Licence details.

 

Should you wish to use my personal data in any form (written
or electronic) you can upon application obtain a licence to use my personal data
in certain circumstances. 

Those circumstances must be detailed, including how you
would acquire said data, how you would store said data, how you propose to
process said data, and what would be the purpose of the output of that processed
data.

You must furnish details of a Security Policy, including
technical information, on how said data will be securely stored/processed,
including any output following processing.

You must furnish details of a Data Retention policy,
detailing how you would depersonalise any such data after a fixed time period.

You must furnish details of your Data Protection Act
registration, and state whether you are a data acquirer, processor or holder of
data. 

You must furnish details of an up to date Disaster Recovery
Policy, which must include details of how personal data would be secured during
all events covered in that policy.

You must furnish details of your data disposal policy,
including technical information on how the data will be destroyed. 

You must upon expiry of the licence to acquire/process/hold
said data furnish a data destruction certificate.

You may not under any circumstances share, gift, loan or
sell any personal data, raw or processed, or in any other way pass my personal
data onto any 3^rd party or any person, company, organisation or
government unless a further licence to do so has been obtained, irrespective of
any contractual obligations. 

I retain the right to withdraw, suspend or cancel any
licence should any breaches of security occur, or the terms of the licence are
not adhered to.

 

 

I own me, I own my personal data.

 

Data tsar attacks surveillance UK