The Government is
working on plan for ‘marking’ people attending demonstrations or protest
marches using the latest in RFID technology. 

I have been made
aware by a political source in
Brussels that as European and Government
legislation becomes more ever more intrusive and control orientated, it is
expected that the frequency and intensity of demonstrations and even civil
action may become more widespread across
Europe.

Police forces in
the UK have already been training for mass civil disobedience and now anti
demonstrator planners across Europe intend to use miniature RFID chips in a ‘cloud’
to be dropped from rooftops or helicopter to ‘mark’ those in attendance in anti
government marches and demonstrations.  

The RFID chips
are so small that they would get into the hair and clothing, and possibly be
breathed in by every individual present and would be virtually impossible to remove.
(have you ever tried to get rid of party glitter).

Police would then
set up check points with RFID scanners in a perimeter around the venue, as well
as railway stations and bus stops, allowing them to identify those who attended
up to weeks afterwards. 

The latest
version of RFID chips are smaller than a grain of sand, only measuring 0.05 x
0.05 mm, and  come with a 128-bit memory
capable of storing an identification number of up to 38 digits. Using the ID
number on the chips, Police would be able to identify which demonstration
people attended , or even whether they had attended more than one demonstration.


Read more about
the new RFID chips here
and here.

 

 

'The Great Global Warming Swindle',
broadcast by Channel 4, put the case for scepticism about man-made climate
change. The programme sparked a heated debate and charges of scientific
inaccuracy. Here, its director, Martin Durkin, responds to the critics, here in
the Telegraph.

Why am I paying taxes on something that occurs naturally ?

Until this debate is over, we have to ensure that our
politicians are not allowed to use only one side of this story as an excuse to
tax the hell out of us.

 

 

 

This story by Christopher
Booker in the Sunday
Telegraph
serves as a chilling warning to us all, because one day, when we
are all in possession of our ID cards and ePassports, chipped and catalogued, and
if the unelected European Commission gets its way that will be very soon, this story
wont be about the cattle on a farm, it will be about when they come to check which
people are living in your street, or on your estate.

 

Of all the
stories I have covered about what is now called the Department for Environment,
Food and Rural Affairs, few have been more remarkable than the disaster that
has just befallen David Dobbin, a 43-year-old Cheshire farmer, who derived his
entire livelihood from a large dairy herd. His 567 cows, including pedigree
Ayrshires and
Holsteins, had won prizes, and were worth upwards
of £500,0000. 

In 2005 Cheshire trading standards officials, acting for
Defra (one hopes
Cheshire's taxpayers do not mind officials whose salaries
they pay acting for a government department) began a long series of visits, to
inspect the documentation required for Mr Dobbin's cattle under EC rules. The
more they attempted to check the animals' eight-digit ear tags against their EC
“cattle passports”, the more they claimed to have found
“irregularities”, although they failed to explain how many or what
these were.

Last November, on
Defra's instructions, the officials seized all Mr Dobbin's passports, making it
illegal for him to move animals off his farm and all but wiping out his income.
Last month, serving him with a “notice to identify”, they removed his
herd to another farm, stating that, under EC regulation 494/98, it was their
intention to destroy all 567 animals. 

Dating back to
the BSE panic, this diktat says that “if the keeper of an animal cannot
prove its identification in two working days, it shall be destroyed without
delay” and “without compensation”. These powers, as I noted when
the regulation was issued in 1998, were unprecedented. Nevertheless the
regulation permits officials to destroy only animals that cannot be identified.

Defra has never
claimed that the paperwork for most of Mr Dobbin's cows was not in order, only
that the officials had found “what they believed to be an unacceptable
level of non-compliance with the regulations”, and that this “could
have serious implications for the protection of the human food chain”. 

Less than an hour
before slaughter was due to begin, Mr Dobbin's combative
Liverpool lawyer, David Kirwan, got a High Court
injunction, giving the cows a stay of execution. He also won leave from Mr
Justice Goldring for judicial review, on the grounds that Defra was acting
beyond its powers. But this month, as the injunction expired, Defra insisted
that, unless Mr Dobbin could prove the identification of every one of his
animals, they must still be destroyed.

Since all his
passports, the most obvious means of identification, had been confiscated, this
was impossible. 

Defra told the
court that Mr Dobbin would instead have to provide
DNA identification for each animal, within
two days. This would have been technically impossible, even if Defra had not
moved the cows elsewhere and refused him access.

The need to
proceed with the slaughter, Defra argued, was urgent, because it had no
resources to look after the cattle properly, causing severe “animal
welfare” problems. The judge felt he had little option but to give the
go-ahead, and on March 8 and 9 the cows were destroyed. 

All Mr Dobbin can
now hope for is that the judicial review may confirm that Defra acted outside
the law. The officials agreed in court that they had never used these powers on
anything like such a scale before. It has not been claimed that Mr Dobbin's
animals posed any health risk (BSE this year is down to a single case). His
only alleged offence was “non-compliance” with complex bureaucratic
procedures, to an extent which Defra still cannot specify. For this he has seen
his livelihood go up in smoke, without a penny in compensation.

 

What
worries me more than the stupid rules and regulations, are the
Moron’s who are happy to carry
them out. If they are happy to destroy one man’s entire life without
questioning what they were doing, just wait until they are let loose on entire
estates….compliance, compliance, compliance. 

When
it comes time to round up people, perhaps we will be lucky and only end up in a
Chinese made portable container prison, or RAF Coltishall which is currently
being fitted out for, well for what who knows, the Home office originally said
is was for extra prison places, the following week they said it was for illegal
immigrants, next week…..

 

 

In June 2002 former
Tory Minister Peter Lilley,  Secretary
for Social Security, 1992-97, wrote an article for the Observer.
He gave his reasons for why, as a minister, he had rejected the idea of ID
cards when in office. 

The words that he
wrote 5 years ago sound almost prophetic now, but the reasoning he used then,
and from most of the thinking civilised population of the
UK now, has not changed. His thoughts then about ID
cards being akin to quack medicines claiming to cure ailments before they are
diagnosed ring even true, as the present lame duck government tries to find new and
novel reasons for having such a card, whilst at the same time creating the
environment into which their argument neatly fits.

It bears more than a striking
similarity to the debate in the run up to the congestion charge being
implemented in
London. From Ken Livingston’s perspective, the argument was about cutting out
the congestion, but his real agenda was about raising money.  

In order to
create that reality, although denied by so many, traffic lights were being
phased differently, creating the congestion, and road schemes for which
Livingston borrowed £700 million to complete, were taking road space away from
the motorists, creating even further congestion, with new junctions and road
narrowing, cutting down from 2 lanes to 1 lane along many miles of London’s
road network. 

A joint RAC/AA report at the time said that the
number of physical vehicles in London had increased very little over the
previous 5 years, but the amount of road to put them on along the primary
routes had been reduced by nearly 20 pct.
 

Government and Local
Authorities have often in the past and are doing now, engineering events and
situations to suit their political agendas, and the ID card agenda is no
different.

Peter Lilley
explained that on critical inspection, claims that smart ID cards would solve
all our woes evaporated. The police explained that they almost never had
problems identifying suspects, only in catching and convicting them. The
security services explained that (as the 11 September terrorists showed)
terrorists rarely conceal their identity.

The immigration
service explained that all illegal immigrants can, and most do, claim asylum,
at which point their fingerprints are stored on a central computer and they were
given an identity document without which they cannot legally obtain benefits or
jobs. 

But by reducing the
efficiency of the Immigration service, and scrapping the identity document they
allow more and more illegal immigrants to enter the country, fail to keep track
of them, and allow them unfettered access to our vital national services, such as
health and benefits.

Allowing
the Police forces across
England and Wales to degenerate into little more than
statistics takers at the public facing end, they have allowed the worst elements of low level crime to increase. However, behind the scenes, the bit the public doesn't always see,  they are becoming the most efficient intelligence gathering agency.

By letting the Prison Service deteriorate, closing down prisons like Mayhill and Low Moss, creating a prison space shortage and at the same time building 'camps', like RAF Colitshall and importing Chinese made portable container prisons.

By allowing our
NHS hospitals and services to be run by Management Trusts rather than Clinicians they have let the service degenerate to a point where no matter how much money is
pumped into the system failure is assured.

By consistently
fiddling and meddling with the Education system, the curriculum, the University’s,
reshaping  6th form colleges
and continually changing the exam results system and certificates that the
Education system is now a laughing stock around the world. 

These have been
deliberate policies to allow the infrastructure of the nation to decline, whilst
smiling and telling the public that they have invested record amounts of money.

There will come a point where the only resort that this government will give
you to redress the balance is controlled citizenship, and that will all centre
around an ID card.

As a nation we
have been fooled, we have been hoodwinked, and we should have listened to the
prophetic words of Peter Lilley back in 2002, it is getting dangerously
close to being too late to do anything about it. 

Many years ago I
recall, the words of a senior Russian businessman. In
London with a trade mission, when asked about
his ability to travel freely, stated that “Communism was only for the masses, for
the peasants”.

To put that into
a modern perspective, it is interesting to note that under the current NIR, ID
card and ePassport plans, none of the members of our present government, senior
members of the opposition and senior civil servants will be required to have
their
DNA taken, IRIS scans or being subjected to
fingerprinting in order to obtain their government level ID cards. That
indignity will only be for the rest of us, the masses, the peasants of this
land. 

Welcome to the
proletariat ruled by the European and NuLab Politburo.

 


In June 2002 former
Tory Minister Peter Lilley,  Secretary
for Social Security, 1992-97, wrote an article for the Observer.
He gave his reasons for why, as a minister, he had rejected the idea of ID
cards when in office. 

The words that he
wrote 5 years ago sound almost prophetic now, but the reasoning he used then,
and from most of the thinking civilised population of the
UK now, has not changed. His thoughts then about ID
cards being akin to quack medicines claiming to cure ailments before they are
diagnosed ring even true, as the present lame duck government tries to find new and
novel reasons for having such a card, whilst at the same time creating the
environment into which their argument neatly fits.

It bears more than a striking
similarity to the debate in the run up to the congestion charge being
implemented in
London. From Ken Livingston’s perspective, the argument was about cutting out
the congestion, but his real agenda was about raising money.  

In order to
create that reality, although denied by so many, traffic lights were being
phased differently, creating the congestion, and road schemes for which
Livingston borrowed £700 million to complete, were taking road space away from
the motorists, creating even further congestion, with new junctions and road
narrowing, cutting down from 2 lanes to 1 lane along many miles of London’s
road network. 

A joint RAC/AA report at the time said that the
number of physical vehicles in London had increased very little over the
previous 5 years, but the amount of road to put them on along the primary
routes had been reduced by nearly 20 pct.
 

Government and Local
Authorities have often in the past and are doing now, engineering events and
situations to suit their political agendas, and the ID card agenda is no
different.

Peter Lilley
explained that on critical inspection, claims that smart ID cards would solve
all our woes evaporated. The police explained that they almost never had
problems identifying suspects, only in catching and convicting them. The
security services explained that (as the 11 September terrorists showed)
terrorists rarely conceal their identity.

The immigration
service explained that all illegal immigrants can, and most do, claim asylum,
at which point their fingerprints are stored on a central computer and they were
given an identity document without which they cannot legally obtain benefits or
jobs. 

But by reducing the
efficiency of the Immigration service, and scrapping the identity document they
allow more and more illegal immigrants to enter the country, fail to keep track
of them, and allow them unfettered access to our vital national services, such as
health and benefits.

Allowing
the Police forces across
England and Wales to degenerate into little more than
statistics takers at the public facing end, they have allowed the worst elements of low level crime to increase. However, behind the scenes, the bit the public doesn't always see,  they are becoming the most efficient intelligence gathering agency.

By letting the Prison Service deteriorate, closing down prisons like Mayhill and Low Moss, creating a prison space shortage and at the same time building 'camps', like RAF Colitshall and importing Chinese made portable container prisons.

By allowing our
NHS hospitals and services to be run by Management Trusts rather than Clinicians they have let the service degenerate to a point where no matter how much money is
pumped into the system failure is assured.

By consistently
fiddling and meddling with the Education system, the curriculum, the University’s,
reshaping  6th form colleges
and continually changing the exam results system and certificates that the
Education system is now a laughing stock around the world. 

These have been
deliberate policies to allow the infrastructure of the nation to decline, whilst
smiling and telling the public that they have invested record amounts of money.

There will come a point where the only resort that this government will give
you to redress the balance is controlled citizenship, and that will all centre
around an ID card.

As a nation we
have been fooled, we have been hoodwinked, and we should have listened to the
prophetic words of Peter Lilley back in 2002, it is getting dangerously
close to being too late to do anything about it. 

Many years ago I
recall, the words of a senior Russian businessman. In
London with a trade mission, when asked about
his ability to travel freely, stated that “Communism was only for the masses, for
the peasants”.

To put that into
a modern perspective, it is interesting to note that under the current NIR, ID
card and ePassport plans, none of the members of our present government, senior
members of the opposition and senior civil servants will be required to have
their
DNA taken, IRIS scans or being subjected to
fingerprinting in order to obtain their government level ID cards. That
indignity will only be for the rest of us, the masses, the peasants of this
land. 

Welcome to the
proletariat ruled by the European and NuLab Politburo.