PJC Journal – Original » 2007 » February

Feb

07

Domestic Extremism or Terrorism. What’s the difference?

IanPJ Main Page Add you comment

Anton Setchell is
the ACPO National Coordinator for Domestic Extremism, and in his press briefing
regarding the Letter Bombs which have gone off over the past few days, declared
that his role does not cover terrorism.

I am now
confused. I thought that when there was
a campaign of terror going on, where bombs of any description were involved,
that was called Terrorism.

Is sending letter
bombs no longer a terrorist activity?.

Or has this
government, and/or the ACPO made the decision that terrorism is only capable of
being wrought by Muslims. In light of Ruth Kelly’s announcement today I rather
think it must be.

Having detained 9
people in the latest terror roundup last week, and then having released 2 of
them without charge, one begins to wonder just how politically motivated the
use of different language is with respect to Muslims, terror and bombs.

To clarify,
according to the ACPO, Muslims are terrorists, letter bombers are only domestic
extremists.

To a logical
mind, if we feel that we really need to differentiate between the 2, surely it
should be the other way around.

According to the
DPP, there is no ‘war’ on terror, it is criminal activity, and that the focus
should be very narrowly centred on the most extremist elements within our
society, a domestic problem, whereas Letter Bombs are very real. They explode,
they hurt people and they cause terror.

I am certain that
the those unfortunate individuals and those who work around them, who have been
on the receiving end of the letter bombs this week are very terrified.

The
wording of the ACPO press release is very politically charged, and am very
sceptical as to the reasons why.

The full press
release from ACPO is here.

Muslims are evil – Kelly. Next step to Dictatorship

IanPJ Main Page Add you comment

Reported by the
foreign press – NOT reported by the British Press

Ruth Kelly, Britain's
communities secretary, launched on Wednesday a $9.9m fund for local
politicians to use to counter the “false and pernicious” ideology of
Muslim extremism.

So, Muslims are
the great threat, and now its Government policy. Just like the Jews under Hitler’s regime, this is only the tip of the iceberg.

Just how are
local politicians to use this fund? see the press release here.

If local authorities cannot deal with disaffected groups from any quarter then they are not doing their job properly, but as with any problem the Labour way is to manage from the centre and throw our money at it.

Ruth Kelly, I am
disgusted. Disgusted with you, and disgusted with this government for allowing
you to introduce this clearly racist fund.

The Stages of
Dictatorship

Create a fear, real or contrived. (9/11)
Engineer events to give credence to that fear.
(7/7)
Find a portion of the population to blame for
that fear. (too much anti Muslim press and TV reporting)
Enact laws to ‘protect’ the majority. (80 new
laws and the Legislative
and Regulatory Reform Act 2006, which is similar to the German
Enabling Act, giving government legislative powers).
Neuter the press. (Press
in Gordon
Browns pocket)
Further engineered events, keep up the scare
propaganda. (we waiting for the government to explode the dirty bomb they
keep talking about).
Save the majority by containing, then detaining
the target group. (Dr Reid nearly has the camps ready now).
Introduction of emergency powers and the
suspension of political and judicial process.
Look for other groups to blame.
Total control

Ruth Kelly also went on to say “We need a new, strengthened partnership and unity of purpose to isolate those who seek to divide us,”

It is very apparent Ms Kelly that the only people who are trying to isolate and divide are this government. (item 7 above).

And where was
Gordon Brown today? Not in the Commons, perhaps putting the final planning in place to the
last phase of the takeover.

Also not reported
in the Press or TV was the exchange today between David Cameron and the Prime
Minister.

–

Every time the Prime Minister is in
trouble, the Chancellor disappears. Why does he do it?”

Mr Blair sought refuge in seeking to pay tribute to the Chancellor for his
handling of the economy, claiming it was the strongest it's ever been.

But Mr Cameron hit back: “If he's doing such a great job then bring him
on. What are we waiting for.”

To more Conservative cheers, he said: “Isn't it the truth that the Prime
Minister is now too isolated to govern and the Chancellor is too indecisive to
get rid of him.”

–

I don’t think that Gordon is too
indecisive, I think he is too dangerous.
Too dangerous to let into No10, too dangerous to be given the reins of
power, Brown along with the Murdoch press and big business are walking us, step by step into dictatorship,
and financially raping this country in the process. Perhaps Tony knows that too, and that may be why
Blair is hanging on for as long as he can.

But its a familiar pattern. Bad news for government, press not reporting it, Gordon Brown not about, terror alert going on. Same shit, new day.

If it ain’t broke don’t fix it

IanPJ Main Page Add you comment

Reading about the
stupidity of the government selection of technology for its flagship Biometric
Passports, where the chips are only guaranteed for 2 years, but the passport is
valid for 10, makes the point that most, if not all of the reforms currently underway
are flawed.

I remember the
old story about NASA, who spent £65 million developing a pen that astronauts
could use in space, it would write in any position, upside down, sideways in
any environment.

The Russians just
used a pencil.!

When we look
closely at the reforms, we see that there has not been a need to undertake
reforms in the way that have been proposed, wasting taxpayer money, other than
an ideology that says we will change everything, even though we don’t know what
we are going to change it to.

The voting in the
Commons at present over the future of the House of Lords is a prime example.
Labour have pledged to reform the House of Lords, but as the number of options
shows very clearly, they don’t have a clue as to what they had in mind BEFORE
they decided to set the process in motion.

Not one of the
reforms that have touched our lives can they honestly say are of benefit, have produced
a return on investment and value for money.

Schools have been
pulled this way and that, with so many reforms no-one knows what the rules and
the qualifications are about any more.

The NHS is in
total disarray, and the IT projects that are supposed to be pulling it all
together are neither welcomed by staff and patients nor wanted, but the cost to
taxpayers has been billions of wasted pounds.

The Libra project,
the most simplistic project on the government books, to join up all the courts
with IT, is 16 years late and no one knows how much it has cost to date.

The Bio-metric
Passport problem with the 2 year warranty on the chips is only scratching the
surface with the technology, its not fit
for purpose, and the UK government is storing up a mass of
problems over IP rights, billions and billions of pounds worth. The functionality is not there, there are
little processes in place to deal with a large number of chip failures, readers
are not available on the front desks, only in the back offices and so the
problems are beginning to mount.

There was little
wrong with the way that government functioned before NuLab started spending our
money and interfering with everything, that a few reorganisations would not
have solved, but now it has got to the stage where every government project,
every government department is now morally, technologically and financially
broke.

Time to put a
stop to it now. If it ain’t broke don’t fix
it.

Even Americans faced with the same garbage as us are saying NO.

If it ain’t broke don’t fix it