Lord Falconer
said in a speech at the Royal United Services Institute in
Whitehall today “In overcoming terrorism,
policy must come first and the law second.” 

Since the tragedy
of 9/11, both the
US and British governments have embarked
upon a policy of ruling using the Politic of Fear. 

Through the press
and media they have promoted time and time again high profile terror arrests, shootings
and detentions aimed directly at the Muslim community, with a media frenzy,
speculation, photographs of mock-up bomb making factories etc, whereas the
reality is that the majority of cases have resulted in the suspects being
released in a very low key manner, along with a warning not to speak to the
press.

A deliberate policy
to create a fear of terrorists, of terror and most importantly of Muslims. 

So far, over 1000
Muslim suspects, nearly all having been born, living and working in England,
have been arrested in this way, but how many have we seen in court facing
terrorist charges? The number is exceptionally small, enough to count using
fingers.

A few have
appeared in court on minor criminal offences such as handling stolen goods,
where evidence had come to light only as a result of house searches following a
terror arrest.

Even the very few
that do make it to court are reported in a bias fashion. Sky News even booked a
link to the court for the trial of the alleged 21/7 bombers, but only for the
time the Prosecution put their case. No air time for the defence. One sided,
fear generating, bias reporting. 

The Policy is to
generate the fear, High Profile. The results however are rarely or never
reported. Low profile.


On the obverse
side of the coin where we have seen arrests of white nationals, even where amassed
explosives have been found, the case is conducted in a very low key way, a very
low key arrest, low key reporting of the trial, and yet the most severe charge
has been for possession of explosives. 

Why then is this
not terrorism, why not the same media frenzy, why not the same government hype.
Perhaps it does not suit their purpose if the alleged perpetrator is not
Muslim. 

When Letter Bombs
have been sent through the mail, been delivered and opened, when those bombs
have exploded, it creates terror.  Not
just for the recipient, but for those who work with them, for everyone in the
building, for the public at large.

Why then is this
not terrorism.  Why does an Assistant
Chief Constable specifically state that his remit in this investigation
excludes terrorism, and refers to it as Domestic Extremism.  

It is abundantly
clear that terrorism according to The Policy is strictly a Muslim thing, that
we must beware of, and fear the Muslim.

Once that premise
has been seared into our minds, government finds it very easy,  on our behalf, to enact a host of new anti
terror, social and crime laws to protect the majority against the evil of the
Muslim terrorist, to reduce civil liberties, remove ancient rights, and allow
the intrusion into our private lives of government owned technology and
government snoopers that under any other circumstances we would never allow. 

This is The
Policy, the Politic of Fear.  To create a
fear, then feed it, blame a portion of the population for that fear, and act accordingly.

Lord Falconer
said in a speech today “In overcoming terrorism, policy must come first
and the law second.”  Proof, if any
were needed that such a policy exists. 

Unless we insist
that the balance is restored, that we classify every case of potential terror
in the same way, then the policy will succeed, and we will walk into a technology
driven dictatorship.

The Government,
Press and Police must ensure that every one of the Muslim cases to date are reclassified
as Domestic Extremism, and every future suspected British Muslim arrest is
under the same terms, or every case of arrest because of chemicals or
explosives is treated under the Terrorism laws. 

We must put this
all back into perspective, and there must be equality in the discharge of duty.

The DPP has
already told us, that the Judiciary see all of these events as crimes, criminal
activity, that there are already laws in place to deal with them, that we do
not need new draconian laws. 

The Point here is
that every time we accept the propaganda driven Politics of Fear, we will lose
another freedom, another right, until we have none left to lose.

 


Lord Falconer
said in a speech at the Royal United Services Institute in
Whitehall today “In overcoming terrorism,
policy must come first and the law second.” 

Since the tragedy
of 9/11, both the
US and British governments have embarked
upon a policy of ruling using the Politic of Fear. 

Through the press
and media they have promoted time and time again high profile terror arrests, shootings
and detentions aimed directly at the Muslim community, with a media frenzy,
speculation, photographs of mock-up bomb making factories etc, whereas the
reality is that the majority of cases have resulted in the suspects being
released in a very low key manner, along with a warning not to speak to the
press.

A deliberate policy
to create a fear of terrorists, of terror and most importantly of Muslims. 

So far, over 1000
Muslim suspects, nearly all having been born, living and working in England,
have been arrested in this way, but how many have we seen in court facing
terrorist charges? The number is exceptionally small, enough to count using
fingers.

A few have
appeared in court on minor criminal offences such as handling stolen goods,
where evidence had come to light only as a result of house searches following a
terror arrest.

Even the very few
that do make it to court are reported in a bias fashion. Sky News even booked a
link to the court for the trial of the alleged 21/7 bombers, but only for the
time the Prosecution put their case. No air time for the defence. One sided,
fear generating, bias reporting. 

The Policy is to
generate the fear, High Profile. The results however are rarely or never
reported. Low profile.


On the obverse
side of the coin where we have seen arrests of white nationals, even where amassed
explosives have been found, the case is conducted in a very low key way, a very
low key arrest, low key reporting of the trial, and yet the most severe charge
has been for possession of explosives. 

Why then is this
not terrorism, why not the same media frenzy, why not the same government hype.
Perhaps it does not suit their purpose if the alleged perpetrator is not
Muslim. 

When Letter Bombs
have been sent through the mail, been delivered and opened, when those bombs
have exploded, it creates terror.  Not
just for the recipient, but for those who work with them, for everyone in the
building, for the public at large.

Why then is this
not terrorism.  Why does an Assistant
Chief Constable specifically state that his remit in this investigation
excludes terrorism, and refers to it as Domestic Extremism.  

It is abundantly
clear that terrorism according to The Policy is strictly a Muslim thing, that
we must beware of, and fear the Muslim.

Once that premise
has been seared into our minds, government finds it very easy,  on our behalf, to enact a host of new anti
terror, social and crime laws to protect the majority against the evil of the
Muslim terrorist, to reduce civil liberties, remove ancient rights, and allow
the intrusion into our private lives of government owned technology and
government snoopers that under any other circumstances we would never allow. 

This is The
Policy, the Politic of Fear.  To create a
fear, then feed it, blame a portion of the population for that fear, and act accordingly.

Lord Falconer
said in a speech today “In overcoming terrorism, policy must come first
and the law second.”  Proof, if any
were needed that such a policy exists. 

Unless we insist
that the balance is restored, that we classify every case of potential terror
in the same way, then the policy will succeed, and we will walk into a technology
driven dictatorship.

The Government,
Press and Police must ensure that every one of the Muslim cases to date are reclassified
as Domestic Extremism, and every future suspected British Muslim arrest is
under the same terms, or every case of arrest because of chemicals or
explosives is treated under the Terrorism laws. 

We must put this
all back into perspective, and there must be equality in the discharge of duty.

The DPP has
already told us, that the Judiciary see all of these events as crimes, criminal
activity, that there are already laws in place to deal with them, that we do
not need new draconian laws. 

The Point here is
that every time we accept the propaganda driven Politics of Fear, we will lose
another freedom, another right, until we have none left to lose.

 


Environment Secretary David Miliband has been urged
by a senior Labour MP to challenge Chancellor Gordon Brown for the party
leadership.

Former minister Frank Field
said Mr Brown was too closely associated with Tony Blair's government and that
he had “indelibly smudged” policy.

The party should instead
consider “jumping a generation”, he wrote in the Guardian
newspaper.

According to the BBC news report Labour
MP David Chaytor said a contest would “strengthen” Mr Brown.

Mr Field, MP for Birkenhead, said the party needed somebody who
“shouts at the electorate that New Labour has already moved on to the next
stage of its life”.

Last week, Mr Milliband
told
BBC One's Question Time: “I predict that
when I come back on this programme in six months or a year's time, people will
be saying 'wouldn't it be great to have that Blair back because we can't stand
that Gordon Brown'.” 

This could of
course just be a rouse to get David Milliband to put up or shut up, but there
appears to be a growing appreciation that someone of his standing needs to
contest the leadership with Gordon Brown, if only to bring all of the issues
out into the open.  To get Gordon Brown
to spell out his past record and have that debated, and to ensure that he lays
out his vision for the future.

The leadership
race has been somewhat devoid up until now of credible candidates, and those
who were heavyweight enough to take on Brown have already had the political
assassins target them, so perhaps Milliband can raise the necessary support and
make a go of it. 

On the opposition
benches there is likely to be widespread support, for a minister who is
generally considered to be inept, to take over Blair’s mantle, as he would make
a far better sparring partner than Brown for David Cameron, and a much more
equal opponent come the General Election.

I think that the
idea has merit, and would bring out the kind of mettle required for the role that
David Milliband may have hidden somewhere. 

However, his
biggest problem should be possibly win, would be what to do with Gordon Brown?.

Should he keep
him in No.11, should he make him repair the fast unravelling economy, should he
make him distance himself from the Smith Institute, or should he just banish
him to the back benches, and choose a new and honest Chancellor.

Brown somewhat arrogantly believes that the keys to No.10 are already his, and has systematically been going through a process of consolidation. Someone like David Milliband is needed to bring this current Chancellor back into check.

 


Following the MI5 shambols with the national security
level warning emails, I have been using a Firefox plugin that allows me to
connect to the Home Office website that gives the same information.

 

However, this evening I noticed that this had not been
advising a security level for several hours, and put it down to the internet
problems that I had been experiencing earlier in the day.

 

So, I tried to connect directly to the Home Office
site, and got this:

 

HTTP Status 500 –


type Exception report

message

description The server encountered an
internal error () that prevented it from fulfilling this request.

exception

javax.servlet.ServletException:
Failed to connect to Mediasurface

        uk.gov.homeoffice.MediasurfaceXControllerServlet.loadDynamicProps(MediasurfaceXControllerServlet.java:199)

        uk.gov.homeoffice.MediasurfaceXControllerServlet.init(MediasurfaceXControllerServlet.java:70)

        javax.servlet.GenericServlet.init(GenericServlet.java:211)

        org.apache.catalina.authenticator.AuthenticatorBase.invoke(AuthenticatorBase.java:462)

        org.apache.catalina.valves.ErrorReportValve.invoke(ErrorReportValve.java:118)

        org.apache.catalina.valves.AccessLogValve.invoke(AccessLogValve.java:535)

        org.apache.coyote.tomcat5.CoyoteAdapter.service(CoyoteAdapter.java:160)

        org.apache.coyote.http11.Http11Processor.process(Http11Processor.java:799)

        org.apache.coyote.http11.Http11Protocol$Http11ConnectionHandler.processConnection(Http11Protocol.java:705)
org.apache.tomcat.util.net.TcpWorkerThread.runIt(PoolTcpEndpoint.java:577)        org.apache.tomcat.util.threads.ThreadPool$ControlRunnable.run(ThreadPool.java:683)

        java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:534)

note The full stack trace of
the root cause is available in the Apache Tomcat/5.0.28 logs.


Apache
Tomcat/5.0.28


Has anyone let John Reid know, otherwise its going to be another thing that he will have to tell Parliament that he doesn't know.


Following the MI5 shambols with the national security
level warning emails, I have been using a Firefox plugin that allows me to
connect to the Home Office website that gives the same information.

 

However, this evening I noticed that this had not been
advising a security level for several hours, and put it down to the internet
problems that I had been experiencing earlier in the day.

 

So, I tried to connect directly to the Home Office
site, and got this:

 

HTTP Status 500 –


type Exception report

message

description The server encountered an
internal error () that prevented it from fulfilling this request.

exception

javax.servlet.ServletException:
Failed to connect to Mediasurface

        uk.gov.homeoffice.MediasurfaceXControllerServlet.loadDynamicProps(MediasurfaceXControllerServlet.java:199)

        uk.gov.homeoffice.MediasurfaceXControllerServlet.init(MediasurfaceXControllerServlet.java:70)

        javax.servlet.GenericServlet.init(GenericServlet.java:211)

        org.apache.catalina.authenticator.AuthenticatorBase.invoke(AuthenticatorBase.java:462)

        org.apache.catalina.valves.ErrorReportValve.invoke(ErrorReportValve.java:118)

        org.apache.catalina.valves.AccessLogValve.invoke(AccessLogValve.java:535)

        org.apache.coyote.tomcat5.CoyoteAdapter.service(CoyoteAdapter.java:160)

        org.apache.coyote.http11.Http11Processor.process(Http11Processor.java:799)

        org.apache.coyote.http11.Http11Protocol$Http11ConnectionHandler.processConnection(Http11Protocol.java:705)
org.apache.tomcat.util.net.TcpWorkerThread.runIt(PoolTcpEndpoint.java:577)        org.apache.tomcat.util.threads.ThreadPool$ControlRunnable.run(ThreadPool.java:683)

        java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:534)

note The full stack trace of
the root cause is available in the Apache Tomcat/5.0.28 logs.


Apache
Tomcat/5.0.28


Has anyone let John Reid know, otherwise its going to be another thing that he will have to tell Parliament that he doesn't know.