PJC Journal – Original

We should never
be complacent that our politicians are doing things right. We should never
believe blindly that they are there to ‘serve and protect’ and are doing things
only in our best interests.

 

When Napoleon III rebuilt Paris, and there was no doubt that Paris needed rebuilding at the time, what
Napoleon had in mind was very different to the expectations of his populus.

He employed the
skills of the eminent German architect Baron Georges-Eugène Haussmann with the
brief to mould Paris into a city with safer streets, better housing, more sanitary,
hospitable, shopper-friendly communities and better traffic flow. 

But what Napoleon
really had in mind was a Paris with streets too broad for rebels to
build barricades across them and where battalions of troops and artillery could
circulate easily if need be. He created broad avenues linked to the main
train-stations so army troops from the provinces could be drafted into the city
and be operative in a short amount of time. 
In other words to control his people.

 
 

When Adolf Hitler
took control of Germany, he saw a nation suffering economic
depression, mass unemployment, social disorder, and political instability. He set
his nation to work, by using government as the primary employer, backed up by nationalism
and militarism.

Hitler oversaw
one of the greatest expansions of industrial production and civil improvement Germany had ever seen, mostly based on debt flotation
and expansion of the military. Nazi policies toward women were strongly
encouraged,” Family values. He also oversaw one of the largest
infrastructure-improvement campaigns in German history, with the construction
of dozens of dams, autobahns, railroads, and other civil works.   

Like Napoleon
before him, Hitler saw these infrastructure improvements not primarily for the
public good, but for the clear and easy movement of troops.  Population control.

Hitler's first government
approached the newly elected Reichstag with the Enabling Act that would have vested the cabinet
with legislative powers for a period of four years. (If you read all of the
information on the link, you will see why and how). Though such a bill was not
unprecedented, this act was different since it allowed for deviations from the
constitution. As the bill required a two-thirds majority in order to pass, the
government needed the support of other parties. 

At the end of the
day, all parties except the Social Democrats voted in favour of the bill. The Enabling
Act was dutifully renewed by the Reichstag every four years, even through World
War II, and the autonomy of German state governments was abolished.

Soon after,
president Paul von Hindenburg died (2 August 1934). Rather than holding new presidential
elections, Hitler's cabinet passed a law proclaiming the presidency dormant and
transferred the role and powers of the head of state to Hitler. 

The rest as they
say is History.

 

 

When Blair and
Brown came to power, we were told that Britain was perceived as a nation suffering
economic depression, mass unemployment, social disorder, and political
instability.

They put this
nation to work, by using government as the primary employer, backed up by nationalism
and militarism. 

Blair and Brown
have overseen one of the greatest expansions of financial, electronic,
computing and consulting industries and civil improvement Britain has ever seen, mostly based on debt flotation,
tax  and overseas use of the military.

Today’s
infrastructure improvements are more based around the electronic world, with an
increase in internet availability, databases and data sharing.   

Like Napoleon and
Hitler before them, Blair and Brown see these infrastructure improvements not
primarily for the public good, but for the clear and easy movement of
data.  Population control.

Under the
perceived threat of unprecedented although unproven terror raining down upon
Britain, monumental amounts of Acts of Parliament rain down on Britain, most of
them removing ancient individual rights, but among them one stands out, The Legislative and
Regulatory Reform Act 2006,
which is similar to the German Enabling Act in that it vested the cabinet
with legislative powers. (if you read
all of the information in the link to the Enabling Bill, you will see why the
sinister similarities to the 7/7 London Bombing and the mass of Anti Terror laws are of
such concern to the public).  

Such a bill in Britain is unprecedented, and this act is
different since it allows for deviations from the constitution, and tentatively
counters the articles in the Bill of Rights 1689.
As the bill required a majority in order to pass, the government needed the
support of other parties.

At the end of the
day, all parties voted in favour of the bill. 

Our Head of
State, Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II is now 80.  At some stage in the future Her Majesty will
either pass away or abdicate.  If history
repeats itself, rather than upholding the constitution and crown a new King, would
Blair or Brown’s cabinet pass a law proclaiming the Monarchy dormant and
transfer the role and powers of the head of state to Downing St.

The building
blocks are in place, the reform of the House of Lords almost complete, the
changes from Royal Departments of Government to Agencies, a debate over the Act
of Union could see it dissolved.  Brown
is already gearing himself for an isolated reign in No.10, a Scotsman in charge
of the English, or would he also, like Hitler before him abolish the autonomy
of the state governments (Welsh Assembly, Scottish Parliament and NI Assembly)
to create a vice like grip on the Nation. 

 

IS HISTORY REPEATING ITSELF

 

 

We should never
be complacent that our politicians are doing things right. We should never
believe blindly that they are there to ‘serve and protect’ and are doing things
only in our best interests.

 

When Napoleon III rebuilt Paris, and there was no doubt that Paris needed rebuilding at the time, what
Napoleon had in mind was very different to the expectations of his populus.

He employed the
skills of the eminent German architect Baron Georges-Eugène Haussmann with the
brief to mould Paris into a city with safer streets, better housing, more sanitary,
hospitable, shopper-friendly communities and better traffic flow. 

But what Napoleon
really had in mind was a Paris with streets too broad for rebels to
build barricades across them and where battalions of troops and artillery could
circulate easily if need be. He created broad avenues linked to the main
train-stations so army troops from the provinces could be drafted into the city
and be operative in a short amount of time. 
In other words to control his people.

 
 

When Adolf Hitler
took control of Germany, he saw a nation suffering economic
depression, mass unemployment, social disorder, and political instability. He set
his nation to work, by using government as the primary employer, backed up by nationalism
and militarism.

Hitler oversaw
one of the greatest expansions of industrial production and civil improvement Germany had ever seen, mostly based on debt flotation
and expansion of the military. Nazi policies toward women were strongly
encouraged,” Family values. He also oversaw one of the largest
infrastructure-improvement campaigns in German history, with the construction
of dozens of dams, autobahns, railroads, and other civil works.   

Like Napoleon
before him, Hitler saw these infrastructure improvements not primarily for the
public good, but for the clear and easy movement of troops.  Population control.

Hitler's first government
approached the newly elected Reichstag with the Enabling Act that would have vested the cabinet
with legislative powers for a period of four years. (If you read all of the
information on the link, you will see why and how). Though such a bill was not
unprecedented, this act was different since it allowed for deviations from the
constitution. As the bill required a two-thirds majority in order to pass, the
government needed the support of other parties. 

At the end of the
day, all parties except the Social Democrats voted in favour of the bill. The Enabling
Act was dutifully renewed by the Reichstag every four years, even through World
War II, and the autonomy of German state governments was abolished.

Soon after,
president Paul von Hindenburg died (2 August 1934). Rather than holding new presidential
elections, Hitler's cabinet passed a law proclaiming the presidency dormant and
transferred the role and powers of the head of state to Hitler. 

The rest as they
say is History.

 

 

When Blair and
Brown came to power, we were told that Britain was perceived as a nation suffering
economic depression, mass unemployment, social disorder, and political
instability.

They put this
nation to work, by using government as the primary employer, backed up by nationalism
and militarism. 

Blair and Brown
have overseen one of the greatest expansions of financial, electronic,
computing and consulting industries and civil improvement Britain has ever seen, mostly based on debt flotation,
tax  and overseas use of the military.

Today’s
infrastructure improvements are more based around the electronic world, with an
increase in internet availability, databases and data sharing.   

Like Napoleon and
Hitler before them, Blair and Brown see these infrastructure improvements not
primarily for the public good, but for the clear and easy movement of
data.  Population control.

Under the
perceived threat of unprecedented although unproven terror raining down upon
Britain, monumental amounts of Acts of Parliament rain down on Britain, most of
them removing ancient individual rights, but among them one stands out, The Legislative and
Regulatory Reform Act 2006,
which is similar to the German Enabling Act in that it vested the cabinet
with legislative powers. (if you read
all of the information in the link to the Enabling Bill, you will see why the
sinister similarities to the 7/7 London Bombing and the mass of Anti Terror laws are of
such concern to the public).  

Such a bill in Britain is unprecedented, and this act is
different since it allows for deviations from the constitution, and tentatively
counters the articles in the Bill of Rights 1689.
As the bill required a majority in order to pass, the government needed the
support of other parties.

At the end of the
day, all parties voted in favour of the bill. 

Our Head of
State, Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II is now 80.  At some stage in the future Her Majesty will
either pass away or abdicate.  If history
repeats itself, rather than upholding the constitution and crown a new King, would
Blair or Brown’s cabinet pass a law proclaiming the Monarchy dormant and
transfer the role and powers of the head of state to Downing St.

The building
blocks are in place, the reform of the House of Lords almost complete, the
changes from Royal Departments of Government to Agencies, a debate over the Act
of Union could see it dissolved.  Brown
is already gearing himself for an isolated reign in No.10, a Scotsman in charge
of the English, or would he also, like Hitler before him abolish the autonomy
of the state governments (Welsh Assembly, Scottish Parliament and NI Assembly)
to create a vice like grip on the Nation. 

 

IS HISTORY REPEATING ITSELF

 

 

Today is Holocaust Day, a day of remembrance,
a day to reflect on the millions of innocents who had their liberties destroyed
and their lives terminated in the most horrific ways in the furtherance of a
political dream.  Let their suffering
never be forgotten, we must never forget.

We must never forget to ensure that this
never happens on this planet again. 

Whilst the emphasis for the Holocaust has
always been on the millions of Jews who suffered in the hands of the Nazi’s, it
must also be remembered that hundreds of thousands of Blacks, Gypsies, mentally
ill, disabled, trade unionists, political opponents, homosexuals, petty criminals and social misfits also suffered along side
them.

It was not just ethnic cleansing of the
worst kind, it was also social cleansing. 

Unfortunately the majority of youth in Britain
are not aware of these facts, because History along with Geography  as core curriculum subjects were dropped many
years ago, and children instead find themselves being taught  personal, social and health education (PSHE),
which covers sex and drugs advice and vocational courses.

History has always taught us that those who
study history learn the lessons of the past, and the risk of repeating events
like the rise of Nazism, the Holocaust and maybe nuclear war are much reduced. 

A teenager’s view of the world today tends
to be very insular, with little or no knowledge of the world at large, which
countries are where, what their capitals are, what the political make up of a
country is, or how history shaped the world and its peoples into the planet
that we live on now.

Teaching Nationalism or Britishness, as
suggested by Brown and Straw is divisive, and can only lead to the insular
thinking that allowed the rise of the Nazi Party in 1937.  A Department for Education and Skills
spokesman said: “Having an understanding of history is vital. That's why
all five to14-year-olds must study history with a particular focus on British
history. 

What they are being taught fails to put Britain
in perspective, as part of the bigger world, and its place in that world.  It fails to teach the interaction through
time that Britain has had with other countries, other political systems, the
wars it has fought and why, whether they were right or wrong, whether they were
just or stupid, and in particular does not teach of the Holocaust, claiming
that to do so would be  insensitive, and
does not take into account our multicultural make up.

That is exactly WHY it must be taught in
our schools. 

The Qualifications and Curriculum Authority
has argued for the use of more dates in history to build up “the big
picture”, but government is adamant that Britishness is the way forward.

With a government view that is both insular
and divisive, it is unfortunately a reality that this country will be heading
for a new Holocaust, one upon its own people. 

The Government have already enabled laws that
would allow such events to take place, camps are being built under the guise of
a mismanaged Home Office and a Prison Service with no spare places, and are
still pushing for more and more inward looking draconian laws.

We have to pray that the youth of today,
from all cultures and backgrounds, are a little more worldly wise than we give
them credit for.

 

 

Today is Holocaust Day, a day of remembrance,
a day to reflect on the millions of innocents who had their liberties destroyed
and their lives terminated in the most horrific ways in the furtherance of a
political dream.  Let their suffering
never be forgotten, we must never forget.

We must never forget to ensure that this
never happens on this planet again. 

Whilst the emphasis for the Holocaust has
always been on the millions of Jews who suffered in the hands of the Nazi’s, it
must also be remembered that hundreds of thousands of Blacks, Gypsies, mentally
ill, disabled, trade unionists, political opponents, homosexuals, petty criminals and social misfits also suffered along side
them.

It was not just ethnic cleansing of the
worst kind, it was also social cleansing. 

Unfortunately the majority of youth in Britain
are not aware of these facts, because History along with Geography  as core curriculum subjects were dropped many
years ago, and children instead find themselves being taught  personal, social and health education (PSHE),
which covers sex and drugs advice and vocational courses.

History has always taught us that those who
study history learn the lessons of the past, and the risk of repeating events
like the rise of Nazism, the Holocaust and maybe nuclear war are much reduced. 

A teenager’s view of the world today tends
to be very insular, with little or no knowledge of the world at large, which
countries are where, what their capitals are, what the political make up of a
country is, or how history shaped the world and its peoples into the planet
that we live on now.

Teaching Nationalism or Britishness, as
suggested by Brown and Straw is divisive, and can only lead to the insular
thinking that allowed the rise of the Nazi Party in 1937.  A Department for Education and Skills
spokesman said: “Having an understanding of history is vital. That's why
all five to14-year-olds must study history with a particular focus on British
history. 

What they are being taught fails to put Britain
in perspective, as part of the bigger world, and its place in that world.  It fails to teach the interaction through
time that Britain has had with other countries, other political systems, the
wars it has fought and why, whether they were right or wrong, whether they were
just or stupid, and in particular does not teach of the Holocaust, claiming
that to do so would be  insensitive, and
does not take into account our multicultural make up.

That is exactly WHY it must be taught in
our schools. 

The Qualifications and Curriculum Authority
has argued for the use of more dates in history to build up “the big
picture”, but government is adamant that Britishness is the way forward.

With a government view that is both insular
and divisive, it is unfortunately a reality that this country will be heading
for a new Holocaust, one upon its own people. 

The Government have already enabled laws that
would allow such events to take place, camps are being built under the guise of
a mismanaged Home Office and a Prison Service with no spare places, and are
still pushing for more and more inward looking draconian laws.

We have to pray that the youth of today,
from all cultures and backgrounds, are a little more worldly wise than we give
them credit for.