In a post tonight from The Norfolk Blogger a
story tonight from
BBC’s Newsnight programme.

Newnight reveals Iran offered to
cease support for terrorism

Newsnight revealed tonight Iran
offered to withdraw all support for Hamas and Hezbollah in Spring 2003. It is
also clear the
Iran was willing to hand over Al Qaeda people they believed to be
operating in
Iran. All the Iranians wanted was for the USA to stop
the activities of a terrorist group called the “People's Mojahideen”
(also called the MEK or MKO). This group, based in
Northern Iraq, wants to
overthrow the Iranian regime.

What Newsnight asked was why this offer from the Iranians was rejected by US vice
president Dick Cheney.

Imagine what the effect on Iraq
might have been without
Iran funding and supporting the Shias ? And all this was preventable if
the
US had stopped allowing terrorist attacks being launched from Iraq in
to
Iran.

The problem, as Newsnight revealed, is that although the “People's
Mojahideen” are a listed terrorist organisation, some within the
“Neo-Con's” saw the “People's Mojahideen” as a way of
possibly removing the “People's Mojahideen”.

However many people have died because of this wanton act of American's posturing.

This Newsnight story confirms what I suspected when
I wrote about the press watching the wrong story i.e. the Iraq Policy
committee, the real
story
is the neo-con Dick Cheney run Iran Policy committee.

The Haliburton and Oil lobby funded Cheney wants a war with Iran more
than Bush does, and while all the attention is on Bush and his big push policy,
Cheney is working behind the scenes to destabilise
Iraq by actively
supporting the Iranian opposition within
Iraq so
that war with
Iran becomes inevitable.

 


In a post tonight from The Norfolk Blogger a
story tonight from
BBC’s Newsnight programme.

Newnight reveals Iran offered to
cease support for terrorism

Newsnight revealed tonight Iran
offered to withdraw all support for Hamas and Hezbollah in Spring 2003. It is
also clear the
Iran was willing to hand over Al Qaeda people they believed to be
operating in
Iran. All the Iranians wanted was for the USA to stop
the activities of a terrorist group called the “People's Mojahideen”
(also called the MEK or MKO). This group, based in
Northern Iraq, wants to
overthrow the Iranian regime.

What Newsnight asked was why this offer from the Iranians was rejected by US vice
president Dick Cheney.

Imagine what the effect on Iraq
might have been without
Iran funding and supporting the Shias ? And all this was preventable if
the
US had stopped allowing terrorist attacks being launched from Iraq in
to
Iran.

The problem, as Newsnight revealed, is that although the “People's
Mojahideen” are a listed terrorist organisation, some within the
“Neo-Con's” saw the “People's Mojahideen” as a way of
possibly removing the “People's Mojahideen”.

However many people have died because of this wanton act of American's posturing.

This Newsnight story confirms what I suspected when
I wrote about the press watching the wrong story i.e. the Iraq Policy
committee, the real
story
is the neo-con Dick Cheney run Iran Policy committee.

The Haliburton and Oil lobby funded Cheney wants a war with Iran more
than Bush does, and while all the attention is on Bush and his big push policy,
Cheney is working behind the scenes to destabilise
Iraq by actively
supporting the Iranian opposition within
Iraq so
that war with
Iran becomes inevitable.

 


Cabinet minister Peter Hain woke up today, and read
the writing on the wall for New Labour.
 

He described the US government as the “most
right-wing” in living memory.

In a move designed to distance himself from Blair policy, Mr Hain, a
deputy leadership contender, said in an interview with the New Statesman
magazine, “President George Bush's foreign policy has “failed”.

He said: “The neo-con mission has failed.

“It's not only failed to
provide a coherent international policy, it's failed wherever it's been tried,
and it's failed with the American electorate, who kicked it into touch last
November.”

Admitting that government
policy had been flawed, he went on to say that: “The problem for us as a
government … was actually maintaining a working relationship with what was
the most right-wing American administration – if not ever, then in living
memory”.

 

Does
this mean that we can now switch off all the government computers, and go back
to being a free and Independent UK again…..

 

For those of you
who have seen the TV drama ‘The Trial of Tony Blair’ which had its first
showing on More4 on Monday evening, and is repeated on C4 tomorrow, you will
know that this was the fictional story of Tony being charged for war crimes and
being forced to trial in The Hague, by the International War Crimes Tribunal. 

Most of us agree
that whilst it would probably be a very popular event, should it ever come to
pass, there may be a more local remedy to hand, or should I say by Tony’s hand.


The new Serious
Crime Bill being introduced by this government states the following. 

a person has been
involved in serious crime in
England and Wales if he—

  • has committed a serious offence in a
    country outside
    England and Wales
  • has facilitated the commission by
    another person of a serious offence in a country outside
    England and Wales; or
  • has conducted himself in a way that
    was likely to facilitate the commission by himself or another person of a
    serious offence in a country outside
    England and Wales (whether or not such an offence was
    committed).
     

a serious offence
in a country outside
England and Wales means an offence under the law of a country
outside
England and Wales which, at the time when the court is
considering the application or matter in question would be an offence under the
law of
England and Wales if committed in or as regards England and Wales.

So, if we
consider that the War in Iraq has been declared by the U.N. as an illegal war, or
that this country has not passed through parliament a Declaration of War, for
every action by a British serviceman that could be considered an illegal act if
it were to have happened in the UK, i.e. assault, false detention, murder etc,
then members of the cabinet, who technically facilitated the commission of such
acts have fallen foul of this new law.

Unlike the C4
Drama, where Gordon Brown helped to facilitate Tony’s trial, under their own
law, he could be in the dock beside him.

The only thing to ponder now is – can we get Bush the same way if he every visited the UK? 

For those of you
who have seen the TV drama ‘The Trial of Tony Blair’ which had its first
showing on More4 on Monday evening, and is repeated on C4 tomorrow, you will
know that this was the fictional story of Tony being charged for war crimes and
being forced to trial in The Hague, by the International War Crimes Tribunal. 

Most of us agree
that whilst it would probably be a very popular event, should it ever come to
pass, there may be a more local remedy to hand, or should I say by Tony’s hand.


The new Serious
Crime Bill being introduced by this government states the following. 

a person has been
involved in serious crime in
England and Wales if he—

  • has committed a serious offence in a
    country outside
    England and Wales
  • has facilitated the commission by
    another person of a serious offence in a country outside
    England and Wales; or
  • has conducted himself in a way that
    was likely to facilitate the commission by himself or another person of a
    serious offence in a country outside
    England and Wales (whether or not such an offence was
    committed).
     

a serious offence
in a country outside
England and Wales means an offence under the law of a country
outside
England and Wales which, at the time when the court is
considering the application or matter in question would be an offence under the
law of
England and Wales if committed in or as regards England and Wales.

So, if we
consider that the War in Iraq has been declared by the U.N. as an illegal war, or
that this country has not passed through parliament a Declaration of War, for
every action by a British serviceman that could be considered an illegal act if
it were to have happened in the UK, i.e. assault, false detention, murder etc,
then members of the cabinet, who technically facilitated the commission of such
acts have fallen foul of this new law.

Unlike the C4
Drama, where Gordon Brown helped to facilitate Tony’s trial, under their own
law, he could be in the dock beside him.

The only thing to ponder now is – can we get Bush the same way if he every visited the UK?