As more information comes to light, the government still doggedly refuses to provide us with a public enquiry into the events of 7/7, and the ongoing trial of the 24/7 bombers, we see more disinformation being printed in our press.

Postman Patel highlights this and offers a reward, but for those who cannot get past the multicoloured output from his blog, you can read the Mirror article here. (Painstakingly re-created by the New York Police Dept?, how many flats in Alexandra Grove, Leeds have air conditioning?).  Who is kidding who? The Mirror or the NYPD?


I am seriously
beginning to believe that there is something very nasty going on in Britain
today, something unsavoury and evil, and while it is presented as being good
for us, in everything I have seen and read, I can only conclude that it is all
to our detriment.   

The government is
establishing a take over.  A takeover of
our rights, a takeover of our liberties, a takeover of our parliament, a
takeover of our privacy, a takeover of our freedom.

For those who
throw back 'conspiracy theory' to silence all, lets look at some of the
theories. 

  • There is the ‘World Government’
    theory, well documented and possibly plausible, but I don’t think so in
    our lifetimes.
  • There is the ‘Oil’ theory.  This one says that as the west is
    running out of energy, both Oil and Gas, it must prepare itself to secure
    those energy sources through war. Perhaps this has something to do with
    the war in
    Afghanistan and Iraq, the probability of war in Iran, perhaps Venezuela at a later stage as they align
    themselves closely with
    Iran. 
    Very plausible, very possible but a lack of solid evidence to be
    certain.
     
  • Then there is the  ‘Brave New World’ theory, also known as the
    Soviet Socialist Republic of Britain, Big Brother, 1984, etc.  Whatever you want to call it, this is
    where I believe this country is heading right now.

Following 9/11,
both the US and UK governments embarked upon a policy of regime change, not for
those countries overseas that they would have us believe were responsible for
the terrorist activity, but here at home in our own countries, and to a lesser
extent across Europe. 

The Lie that is
allowing them to do this, ‘Our Security’. 

Yes, our security
against the hordes of terrorists that are queuing up to hurt us, both domestic
and foreign, and in order to protect you and me from these terrorists, and
preserve our way of life, they must curtail our freedoms and change our way of
life. 

The plethora of
new legislation enacted since 9/11 which curbs our rights, gives legislative
powers to Ministers, gives the police unprecedented
powers to arrest, detain, round up suspects, take and keep
DNA and fingerprints, record our movements
(legally and illegally),
fingerprint people by the roadside
and to arrest them if they refuse – whereupon fingerprints,
DNA and a photograph will all be taken, roadside
eye tests, removes our right to privacy, listens to our phone calls, reads our
texts and emails, logs where you work, how much you earn, where and how you
spend your money, has access to your bank accounts and all of the legislation is backed up with punitive fines or
imprisonment.

It now wants to
shackle you with an all encompassing ID card, and
despite announcements in Parliament to say it would be voluntary, you will have
to pay for it, will be fined for not having it, and will be punished for not
carrying it. Read the Action
Plan
.

They have removed
our right to
protest
and gone is our right to silence.

No longer do we
have the right to claim Innocence before proven guilty. We have all become
suspects, the onus is increasingly on us to prove our innocence to an
overbearing, officious and meddlesome state. 

The Inquiries Act
and the Civil Contingencies Act, both reduce parliamentary scrutiny, and by
using the Courts Act together with the Domestic Violence, Crime and Victims
Act, the government swept away a 400-year-old common law, which guaranteed that
an Englishman's home was his castle and that no bailiff could break in to
collect civil debts.

Not content with
spying on you at home, our government has also given
away your rights
to other nations as well..  

If your company
does any business with the
US, it has to disclose its financial
accounts to the
US authorities under the Sarbanes Oxley Bill
which our government agreed to.

If you use a
credit card to book an airline ticket, the American authorities will have the
right to inspect other transactions you have made on that card. If you provide
an e-mail address, they will be entitled to read other messages sent or
received on that account.

No parliamentary
debate, no public discussion, no democracy and I bet your MP hasn’t got a clue. Time for them
to wake
up
. 

But all of this
is done in your name, its all for ‘your security’.  So that’s ok then.


Since 9/11, there
has been a few terror scares but only a single terror act in the UK, the London
bombings on 7/7, for which the police and security services have failed to
present any evidence, only a derisory report, which is full
of unsubstantiated and unverifiable information, but the Police demanded and
received legislation allowing them discretionary powers that properly belong to
the courts. 

When London train bombers are identified as perfectly
normal nice young men and, one year later, police have found not a scrap of
evidence to connect them or anyone else with the bombings, its very likely that
they really were just nice young men.

The men: http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,22989-1693739,00.html

One year on: http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,22989-2254680.html 

The authorities
have failed to convince me, and many others that this was a terrorist act.  There are suggestions that it was a
government engineered event to get public sympathy for the mass of new
legislation.  Was it a Lie? A
ludicrous diversion
, A means to an end?

It would go some
way to explain why there is a dogged refusal for a public enquiry into these
bombings.  I remain sceptical. 

What is clear
however, is that with the newly acquired powers to arrest and detain, that over
1,000 mainly Muslim men, women and children have been rounded up since
7/7.  Most have since been released
without charge, but some are still in detention or subject to restraint orders.

The modus
operandi of any fledgling authoritarian state is;

  • Create a fear, real or contrived.
  • Engineer events to give credence to
    that fear.
  • Find a portion of the population to
    blame for that fear.
  • Enact laws to ‘protect’ the majority.
  • Neuter the press.
  • Further engineered events, keep up
    the scare propaganda.
  • Save the majority by containing, then
    detaining the target group.
  • Introduction of emergency powers and
    the suspension of political and judicial process
    .
  • Look for other groups to blame.
  • Total control 

Is it beginning
to start to ring bells, look familiar.   
Germany, Russia, East Germany.

I think we have
already reached stages 1-4, and are working on stage 5.

Stages 5, 6, 7 and
8? – Sir Ian Blair, Metropolitan Police Commissioner while addressing the Reform
Club Media Group in Oct 06 stated,
“The British people should 'brace themselves for a truly appalling act of terror'.
He said that following this act of barbarism 'people would be talking quite
openly about internment',”  

No doubt he will
find a willing supplicant in the tougher than tough Home Secretary John Reid, a
member of Communist Party of GB from 1973. (of the biographies I have
found none give a date that he left the CPGB or joined the Labour Party).

Sir Ian Blair has
almost on a weekly basis since that meeting made announcements of impending
terrorist activity, and called for yet more powers for the police.  Keeping up the scare propaganda?

 

 

Another
suggestion is that perhaps there is no Al Queda at all. 
 

Yes we all know
that there are terror organisations, but a super HQ of terrorism called Al
Queda.?  Its almost like Dr Evil, James
Bond, or S.P.E.C.T.O.R. from the Man from U.N.C.L.E.

Had anyone heard of Al Queda before 9/11, was it a lie dreamed up by the skunk works in Washington, adopted by London and used as the motivation to scare the
hell out of everyone.  Hence the ‘we need
to protect you’ mentality that now motivates government’. 

To quote Adolf
Hitler: 'The grossly impudent lie always leaves traces behind it, even after it
has been nailed down, a fact which is known to all expert liars.'.

There is a
documentary that was screened by the
BBC, in March 04, called 'The Power of Nightmares'.

It strongly suggests that
there is no Al Queda network. That it is a fiction.  Draw your own conclusions. 

The video may be
viewed here: http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/video1040.htm

 

We know that
power corrupts, but total power corrupts totally.

Is all of this
that I have written true?. I just don’t know for sure, but I see enough evidence to make
me truly sceptical and believe that if left unchecked we are certainly on the
road to authoritarianism.

At the moment, we
can still make requests to see what government are doing, although various
departments are furnishing less and less information in response to Freedom of
Information requests, but by Easter, unless our MP’s wake up, we may have lost
that right as well.

 

Does any of this
concern you?.  I have nothing to hide, so
I have nothing to fear, I hear you say. 
So did the German shoemaker who was attributed to writing this in 1940.

 

When the Nazis
came for the communists,
I remained silent;
I was not a communist.

When they locked up the social democrats,
I remained silent;
I was not a social democrat.

When they came for the trade unionists,
I did not speak out;
I was not a trade unionist.

When they came for me,
I looked around,
and there was no one left to speak out.

 

 

Don’t be the last
one to look….

As more information comes to light, the government still doggedly refuses to provide us with a public enquiry into the events of 7/7, and the ongoing trial of the 24/7 bombers, we see more disinformation being printed in our press.

Postman Patel highlights this and offers a reward, but for those who cannot get past the multicoloured output from his blog, you can read the Mirror article here. (Painstakingly re-created by the New York Police Dept?, how many flats in Alexandra Grove, Leeds have air conditioning?).  Who is kidding who? The Mirror or the NYPD?


I am seriously
beginning to believe that there is something very nasty going on in Britain
today, something unsavoury and evil, and while it is presented as being good
for us, in everything I have seen and read, I can only conclude that it is all
to our detriment.   

The government is
establishing a take over.  A takeover of
our rights, a takeover of our liberties, a takeover of our parliament, a
takeover of our privacy, a takeover of our freedom.

For those who
throw back 'conspiracy theory' to silence all, lets look at some of the
theories. 

  • There is the ‘World Government’
    theory, well documented and possibly plausible, but I don’t think so in
    our lifetimes.
  • There is the ‘Oil’ theory.  This one says that as the west is
    running out of energy, both Oil and Gas, it must prepare itself to secure
    those energy sources through war. Perhaps this has something to do with
    the war in
    Afghanistan and Iraq, the probability of war in Iran, perhaps Venezuela at a later stage as they align
    themselves closely with
    Iran. 
    Very plausible, very possible but a lack of solid evidence to be
    certain.
     
  • Then there is the  ‘Brave New World’ theory, also known as the
    Soviet Socialist Republic of Britain, Big Brother, 1984, etc.  Whatever you want to call it, this is
    where I believe this country is heading right now.

Following 9/11,
both the US and UK governments embarked upon a policy of regime change, not for
those countries overseas that they would have us believe were responsible for
the terrorist activity, but here at home in our own countries, and to a lesser
extent across Europe. 

The Lie that is
allowing them to do this, ‘Our Security’. 

Yes, our security
against the hordes of terrorists that are queuing up to hurt us, both domestic
and foreign, and in order to protect you and me from these terrorists, and
preserve our way of life, they must curtail our freedoms and change our way of
life. 

The plethora of
new legislation enacted since 9/11 which curbs our rights, gives legislative
powers to Ministers, gives the police unprecedented
powers to arrest, detain, round up suspects, take and keep
DNA and fingerprints, record our movements
(legally and illegally),
fingerprint people by the roadside
and to arrest them if they refuse – whereupon fingerprints,
DNA and a photograph will all be taken, roadside
eye tests, removes our right to privacy, listens to our phone calls, reads our
texts and emails, logs where you work, how much you earn, where and how you
spend your money, has access to your bank accounts and all of the legislation is backed up with punitive fines or
imprisonment.

It now wants to
shackle you with an all encompassing ID card, and
despite announcements in Parliament to say it would be voluntary, you will have
to pay for it, will be fined for not having it, and will be punished for not
carrying it. Read the Action
Plan
.

They have removed
our right to
protest
and gone is our right to silence.

No longer do we
have the right to claim Innocence before proven guilty. We have all become
suspects, the onus is increasingly on us to prove our innocence to an
overbearing, officious and meddlesome state. 

The Inquiries Act
and the Civil Contingencies Act, both reduce parliamentary scrutiny, and by
using the Courts Act together with the Domestic Violence, Crime and Victims
Act, the government swept away a 400-year-old common law, which guaranteed that
an Englishman's home was his castle and that no bailiff could break in to
collect civil debts.

Not content with
spying on you at home, our government has also given
away your rights
to other nations as well..  

If your company
does any business with the
US, it has to disclose its financial
accounts to the
US authorities under the Sarbanes Oxley Bill
which our government agreed to.

If you use a
credit card to book an airline ticket, the American authorities will have the
right to inspect other transactions you have made on that card. If you provide
an e-mail address, they will be entitled to read other messages sent or
received on that account.

No parliamentary
debate, no public discussion, no democracy and I bet your MP hasn’t got a clue. Time for them
to wake
up
. 

But all of this
is done in your name, its all for ‘your security’.  So that’s ok then.


Since 9/11, there
has been a few terror scares but only a single terror act in the UK, the London
bombings on 7/7, for which the police and security services have failed to
present any evidence, only a derisory report, which is full
of unsubstantiated and unverifiable information, but the Police demanded and
received legislation allowing them discretionary powers that properly belong to
the courts. 

When London train bombers are identified as perfectly
normal nice young men and, one year later, police have found not a scrap of
evidence to connect them or anyone else with the bombings, its very likely that
they really were just nice young men.

The men: http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,22989-1693739,00.html

One year on: http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,22989-2254680.html 

The authorities
have failed to convince me, and many others that this was a terrorist act.  There are suggestions that it was a
government engineered event to get public sympathy for the mass of new
legislation.  Was it a Lie? A
ludicrous diversion
, A means to an end?

It would go some
way to explain why there is a dogged refusal for a public enquiry into these
bombings.  I remain sceptical. 

What is clear
however, is that with the newly acquired powers to arrest and detain, that over
1,000 mainly Muslim men, women and children have been rounded up since
7/7.  Most have since been released
without charge, but some are still in detention or subject to restraint orders.

The modus
operandi of any fledgling authoritarian state is;

  • Create a fear, real or contrived.
  • Engineer events to give credence to
    that fear.
  • Find a portion of the population to
    blame for that fear.
  • Enact laws to ‘protect’ the majority.
  • Neuter the press.
  • Further engineered events, keep up
    the scare propaganda.
  • Save the majority by containing, then
    detaining the target group.
  • Introduction of emergency powers and
    the suspension of political and judicial process
    .
  • Look for other groups to blame.
  • Total control 

Is it beginning
to start to ring bells, look familiar.   
Germany, Russia, East Germany.

I think we have
already reached stages 1-4, and are working on stage 5.

Stages 5, 6, 7 and
8? – Sir Ian Blair, Metropolitan Police Commissioner while addressing the Reform
Club Media Group in Oct 06 stated,
“The British people should 'brace themselves for a truly appalling act of terror'.
He said that following this act of barbarism 'people would be talking quite
openly about internment',”  

No doubt he will
find a willing supplicant in the tougher than tough Home Secretary John Reid, a
member of Communist Party of GB from 1973. (of the biographies I have
found none give a date that he left the CPGB or joined the Labour Party).

Sir Ian Blair has
almost on a weekly basis since that meeting made announcements of impending
terrorist activity, and called for yet more powers for the police.  Keeping up the scare propaganda?

 

 

Another
suggestion is that perhaps there is no Al Queda at all. 
 

Yes we all know
that there are terror organisations, but a super HQ of terrorism called Al
Queda.?  Its almost like Dr Evil, James
Bond, or S.P.E.C.T.O.R. from the Man from U.N.C.L.E.

Had anyone heard of Al Queda before 9/11, was it a lie dreamed up by the skunk works in Washington, adopted by London and used as the motivation to scare the
hell out of everyone.  Hence the ‘we need
to protect you’ mentality that now motivates government’. 

To quote Adolf
Hitler: 'The grossly impudent lie always leaves traces behind it, even after it
has been nailed down, a fact which is known to all expert liars.'.

There is a
documentary that was screened by the
BBC, in March 04, called 'The Power of Nightmares'.

It strongly suggests that
there is no Al Queda network. That it is a fiction.  Draw your own conclusions. 

The video may be
viewed here: http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/video1040.htm

 

We know that
power corrupts, but total power corrupts totally.

Is all of this
that I have written true?. I just don’t know for sure, but I see enough evidence to make
me truly sceptical and believe that if left unchecked we are certainly on the
road to authoritarianism.

At the moment, we
can still make requests to see what government are doing, although various
departments are furnishing less and less information in response to Freedom of
Information requests, but by Easter, unless our MP’s wake up, we may have lost
that right as well.

 

Does any of this
concern you?.  I have nothing to hide, so
I have nothing to fear, I hear you say. 
So did the German shoemaker who was attributed to writing this in 1940.

 

When the Nazis
came for the communists,
I remained silent;
I was not a communist.

When they locked up the social democrats,
I remained silent;
I was not a social democrat.

When they came for the trade unionists,
I did not speak out;
I was not a trade unionist.

When they came for me,
I looked around,
and there was no one left to speak out.

 

 

Don’t be the last
one to look….

Not content with the Minister for
Constitutional Affairs trying to slip a quick one in with his Statutory Instrument
due for release over the Easter break that limits FOI requests on the grounds
of cost, TORY MP David Maclean wants to hide EVERYTHING by raising a private
members bill. 

The following private members bill will
have its 2nd
reading
in the HoC on the 19th January.

Freedom of Information (amendment)
David Maclean presented a Bill to amend the Freedom of Information Act 2000 to
exempt from its provisions the House of Commons and House of Lords and
correspondence between Members of Parliament and public authorities: And the
same was read the First time; and ordered to be read a Second time on Friday 19
January, and to be printed. [Bill 39]

Never again will you be able to find out
what any MP, Minister, Chanceller etc etc has done or said.

No longer answerable to the people. 

Cameron, do you expect us to trust you with
our votes now.? 
'nothing to hide?, nothing to fear?'

In a free society, the rights and laws
protect the individual from the government.

In a dictatorship, the rights and laws
protect the government from the people.

Tony Blair thinks that creating a super
database for everyone in Britain is a good idea, then ponder that combined with
all his new laws lets look at the story of 
Average Joe Soap, clean, honest living man.
 

When Joe Soap arrived at his local Jobcentre
to look for work, he had little idea of the nightmare that was about to unfold.

Joe, a carpenter by trade, was forced into bankruptcy
last year as his costs continued to outstrip his income, and the small firm
that he used to run was liquidated, so he needed to find new employment.  

Joe had lived in Burnley all his life, he
had never been in trouble with the police and had always paid his taxes and
VAT, and was feeling confident that he would have no trouble finding new work.

The assistant in the Jobcentre was polite
and pleasant and asked Joe lots of questions about his work experience, and
eventually asked for his new super database number, printed on the back of his
£300 ID card. 

To his amazement, the assistant politely
advised him that she needed to speak to her supervisor, and left Joe alone at
the desk.

A short time later, the supervisor called
Joe into his office, where he was met by an officer of the SOCA, cautioned and
arrested under Section 132 of the Serious Organised Crime and Police Act 2005. 

Taken to the police station he had his
fingerprints, a photograph and
DNA sample taken and was then escorted to the interview room and
questioned.

It transpires that Joe had been in London 3 weeks
earlier, the Police wanted to know why he was there, what he had done in
London, who he had
seen.  They already had pictures of his
car, matched by DVLC and TfL, they knew that he had been in
London for 2 days,
because they had his credit card statements and had seen his Hotel bill and
Congestion Charge payments. 

At some stage during his visit to London,
Joe and his wife had gone to see the Houses of Parliament, as any first time
tourist to London would do, but upon his arrival found that Parliament Square
was full of demonstrators, so he and his wife decided to walk along Whitehall
and head for Trafalgar square.

At some time during this walk, he had been
photographed by the square with the demonstrators.

The Police had also discovered that Joe was
a member the Communist Party of Great Britain, a legitimate organisation, but
his membership was noted. 

They also disclosed that there had been a
form incorrectly filled in during his discussions with the HMRC when he closed down
his firm, and the questioning began to focus on this. 

Why had he lied to the inspectors when his
firm went bust.  Joe insisted that he had
filled in the form correctly, but the police were adamant that the information
on the form was incorrect and that a supplementary form was missing, therefore
he must have failed to provide it, and an investigation into possible fraud
would ensue, despite Joe protesting everything was agreed with HMRC at the
time.

Police then wanted to know why he had
travelled from
Burnley to Oxford the previous month, they had CCTV footage of his journey from
motorway cameras and CCTV in
Oxford town centre and the Car Park, and that this was outside of his
normal routine. 

Joe explained that he
had been looking for work, and that someone had told him of work at a company
in
Oxford, but when he arrived and spoke with them, all the posts had been
filled, even though he had arranged the appointment by phone.

The police told him that they had already listened
to the phone call, and advised that they found its contents to be ‘suspicious’,
as was his journey. No further explanation was given. 

Joe appeared before Magistrates the
following morning.  Police explained that
they had conducted exhaustive enquiries, and that in their opinion Joe was a
potential threat to his local neighbourhood.

They said that neighbours had been interviewed,
some of whom complained that Joe used to start his noisy diesel van up at 6.30
every day when he had been working, and his immediate neighbour who had never
particularly liked him, had complained about the noise late at night when he
put rubbish out.

As Joe and his wife liked to keep
themselves to themselves they rarely spoke with the people in their
street.  Police found this to be suspicious
and anti social. 

Police advised that
they had found extremist material during a search of his home (communist party
brochures), had associated with a known criminal in Oxford, and because he had been involved in a bar room brawl 10 years ago, believed
that he was potentially violent, so police also requested that he be put on the
Violent and Sex Offenders register, and be given a super ASBO, with conditions that
he report his movements for the next 2 years to the Police. 

 

So, Joe Soap, clean, honest living man who
wanted to find new work to pay the mortgage and his bills, never been in
trouble in his life, now has a criminal record, his fingerprints and
DNA will stay on file for
100 years, he now has an ASBO which makes it illegal for him to do everyday
things that the rest of us can do legally, he is no longer allowed to travel to
London, and travel anywhere else in the UK has to be approved by the police, he
is on the V&S Offenders register, and his life is under constant
supervision.

Joe will never be able to work again,
because the
CRB check will show his ‘record’, he will never be able to go on an
overseas holiday, because he has been refused a passport, because he has a ‘record’,
and for a man who has always worked for a living and paid his own way in life, he is
now reduced to living on benefits.  He
has had all his credit cards withdrawn because of an alleged fraud over an
incorrect form.

He is shunned everywhere in his home town,
because the assistant at the jobcentre, having read his entire file, could not keep her mouth shut and told
all her colleagues, who then went on to tell everyone else.


By passing laws and building Databases all your eggs are now in one basket and make everyone, absolutely everyone suspicious, be
the target of suspicion, and allow the lowest rated civil servant access to your
very soul.

I can hear Mr Blair protesting now that
this is not what all these laws are for, but Mr Blair, please understand, THIS
IS HOW THEY WILL BE APPLIED, if not in a dictatorial regime, certainly one in
which it is very easy to hit all your targets when the laws are all on your side.

 

In a
free society, the rights and laws protect the individual from the government.

In a
dictatorship, the rights and laws protect the government from the people.

 

 

CONMAN Peter
Foster is in custody in Port Vila after being arrested by
Vanuatu and Australian Federal Police yesterday
morning.

He has not been
charged with any offences but is expected to face a count of illegally entering
the country. 

Authorities in
four countries had been searching for the 44-year-old since he disappeared from
military custody in
Fiji last week.

A Pacific-wide
alert was issued for him on Thursday after the
AFP said they had information that he was
seen swimming ashore from a yacht in
Vanuatu on January 8. They said he had left Suva on board the boat on January 5.

Arrested with
Foster were two Australian expatriates who were with him at the time. The
couple, long-time residents of
Vanuatu, are likely to face charges of harbouring
an illegal alien. 

Foster had
consistently maintained that he was still in
Fiji but in hiding because the military had
apparently reneged on a deal he did with Commodore Voreqe Bainimarama to help
uncover corruption in the ousted government.

He was awaiting
trial on three charges relating to allegedly having used a forged Queensland
Police Service criminal history to obtain a
Fiji work permit. 

On Thursday,
Australian police revealed that acting on a written request from the police
commissioner of the Federated States of Micronesia, they were investigating
Foster over allegedly defrauding a bank of $US580,000 ($F971,384) in a land
title scam.

It is believed he
is likely to be extradited to
Australia to face questioning over this once he is
dealt with by the
Vanuatu courts. 

Two Australian
lawyers have now been charged with immigration and firearms offences and their
ex-Australian Navy minesweeper has been seized on suspicion they smuggled
Foster out of
Fiji.

The two, and an
Australian man and woman, were arrested on Tuesday after arriving in Port Vila
in their converted dive and salvage boat, the Retriever 1, preparing to look
for sunken wrecks in Vanuatu waters. It is likely they will now face additional
charges related to smuggling Foster into the country.